摘要
我国《个人信息保护法》的制定未有实质进展,而我国个人信息保护立法所采取的分散立法模式又无法满足公众的个人信息保护需求,且以事后追责的传统侵权法逻辑作为个人信息保护的制度起点难以缓解制度设计与现实需求之间的紧张关系。相比之下,欧盟法制中的被遗忘权制度作为一项制度和实践的创新,不以侵权成立为权利行使条件,对于促进个人信息保护尤其是网络环境下的个人信息保护具有重要意义。从其历史、功能和特质三方面考察,被遗忘权能融入我国法制环境,从而改善我国的个人信息保护状况。在不修改实定法的前提下,应通过司法功能的能动发挥,运用解释、类推等裁判工具"创设被遗忘权"保护个人信息权。
There is no real progress in the formulation of the "Personal Data Protection Law'in China, and the decentralized legislative model can not meet the public demand for personal Data protection.In addition to that, the principle of traditional tort law is used as a personal Data protection, which is difficult to ease the tension between the system design and the real needs. In contrast, the right to be forgotten in the EU legal system as a System and theoretical innovation, not take the establishment of infringement as a prerequisite, and especially in the network environment, this right can play a significant role to protect personal data. Investigating its history, function and characteristics, this right can be assimilated China's legal environment well to improve China's personal data protection. In the case of the law cannot be easily modified, it should be through judicial activism, legal interpretation, legal analogy and other referee tools to protect personal data.
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2017年第2期28-33,71,共7页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
个人信息
被遗忘权
个人信息删除权
人格权
法律续造
personal data
the right to be forgotten
the right to delete personal information
personality rights
richterliche rechtsfortbildung