期刊文献+

元代帝王信仰与易学神秘旨归 被引量:2

Emperors' Faith and Mystification of the Changes in the Yuan Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为一统中原的异族王朝,清朝统治者重视理性层面的依据——"治人",而蒙元帝王则更信赖神性的依据——"治术数",甚至通过设置阴阳学将神秘术数制度化,以确保术数获得官学身份而成为举国上下行事决策普遍运用之基础。与此同时,易学的学理性特征凸现为"象数优先"范式,它捩转了宋易经传象数皆为义理载体的次要地位,而将象数视为解《易》的第一要素,且在象数的阐释中形成了象数之变玄妙莫测、象数之悟需人神通灵方能开显的神秘论断。帝王术数信仰与易学学理范式二者互为增长,共同呈现出神秘化的易学形态和由理性回归感性的易学演进逆流。 The Yuan (1271-1368) and Qing (1636-1912) dynasties were established by the previously alien Mongolians and Manchus respectively. The rulers of the Qing dynasty attached importance to the rational basis of ruling over the people. However, rulers of the Yuan dynasty mainly depended on their faith in divinity and emphasized technical numerology related to divination. Moreover, rulers of the Yuan dynasty even systematized the mysterious technical numerology through the establishment of the study of yin-yang theory so as to ensure the official position of numerology as the basis for decision-making throughout the whole nation from top to bottom. Accordingly, Changes scholarship was characterized by the "image-numerology first" paradigm, which reversed the Song (960-1279) tradition where meanings and principles were put in the first place and image-numerology in the second place. On this account, rulers of the Yuan dynasty regarded image-numerology as the supreme element when interpreting the Changes and claimed that image-numerology was so mysterious and unfathomable that only those able to communicate with spirits could grasp its real meanings. Emperors' faith in divination and the theoretical paradigm of Changes scholarship were mutually reinforcing, and as a consequence, Changes scholarship was mystified and experienced a retrogression from rationality to passion.
作者 何素婷 HE Su-ting(College of Liberal Arts, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715)
机构地区 西南大学文学院
出处 《周易研究》 CSSCI 2017年第2期87-96,共10页 Studies of Zhouyi
关键词 元代易学 帝王信仰 神秘旨归 Changes scholarship in the Yuan dynasty emperors' faith aiming at mystification
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献37

  • 1宋·程颐.《周易程氏传》,《二程集》,北京:中华书局,2004年,第700页.
  • 2宋·朱熹.《易本义》,《朱子全书》第一册,上海:上海古籍出版社.合肥:安徽教育出版社,2002年,第146页.
  • 3元·王申子.《大易辑说》卷一,《通志堂精解》第2册,南京:江苏古籍出版社,1996年,第393页.
  • 4元·熊禾.《送胡庭芳序》,《勿轩集》卷一,明隆武刻本.
  • 5元·胡炳文.《答定宇陈先生栎》之五,《云峰集》卷一,《元人文集珍本丛刊》第4册,台北:新文丰出版公司,1985年,第169页.
  • 6元·陈栎.《答胡云峰书》,《定字集》卷十,《元人文集珍本丛刊》第4册,台北:新文丰出版公司,1985年,第381页.
  • 7《嘉靖常德府志》卷十五《人品志·丁易东》,《天一阁藏明代方志选刊》,第56册,上海:上海书店,1990年.
  • 8元·赵汸.《黄楚望先生行状》,《全元文》第54册,南京:凤凰出版社,2005年,第371页.
  • 9元·田泽.《续刊大易缉说始末》,见《大易缉说》卷首,《通志堂经解》第2册,南京:江苏古籍出版社,1996年,第391页.
  • 10《元代易学家王申子易学哲学初探》,山东大学博士论文,2008年,第7页.

共引文献3

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部