期刊文献+

舍曲林治疗缺血性脑卒中后中枢性疼痛的对照研究 被引量:4

A CLINICAL CONTROL STUDY OF SERTRALINE IN TREATMENT OF THE PATIENTS WITH CENTRAL PAIN AFTER STROKE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨舍曲林(sertraline)治疗缺血性脑卒中后中枢性疼痛的疗效和安全性。方法:将180例缺血性脑卒中后中枢性疼痛患者随机分为舍曲林治疗组和对照组,其中治疗组90例,对照组90例。治疗组给予舍曲林每次50 mg,每日1次。对照组给予复合维生素片,1片/次,3次/日,共治疗4周。分别于治疗第1周、2周、4周使用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评价临床疗效,同时测定疼痛缓解度(pain anesis rate,PAR),并比较两组患者治疗前和治疗后各观察时点的VAS评分和疼痛缓解率。结果:本研究治疗组患者治疗前VAS评分为8.2±1.7分,4周后降到4.0±1.3分,而对照组治疗前VAS评分为8.0±1.5分,4周后为6.3±1.6分,治疗前两组VAS评分无明显差异,治疗后第1、2、4周时治疗组VAS评分较对照组明显降低,具有统计学差异。结论:舍曲林用于治疗缺血性脑卒中后中枢性疼痛效果好,可作为缺血性脑卒中后中枢性疼痛患者的药物治疗选择之一。 Objective: To estimate the efficiency and safety of sertraline in treating patients with central pain after ischemic stroke. Methods: 180 patients with central pain after ischemic stroke were randomized into sertraline group (90 patients) and control group (90 patients). The patients in sertraline group were given sertraline 50 mg three times per day and control group with placebo one piece three times per day. We assessed efficacy according visual analogue scale (VAS) and pain anesis rate (PAR) at the first week, second week and forth week after treatment. Results: The VAS score in sertraline group was 8.2 ± 1.7 before taking drugs, and the score declined to 4.0±1.3 after 4 weeks. And the VAS score in control group was 8.0± 1.5, and the score was slightly descended to 6.3±1.6 after 4 weeks. Conclusion: Sertraline is effective and could be a significant choice in treatment of oatients with central oain after ischemic stroke.
出处 《中国疼痛医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2017年第4期268-271,共4页 Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine
关键词 舍曲林 中枢痛 脑卒中 安全性 有效性 Sertraline Central Pain Stroke Safety Efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献61

  • 1盂冬祥,樊碧发,周书元,贾乃光,董兴栋,郭惠明.腰腿痛患者的心理行为特征及其与疼痛的关系[J].中日友好医院学报,1995,9(4):210-213. 被引量:9
  • 2丁振灿.抗抑郁药阿米替林的镇痛机制[J].华北煤炭医学院学报,2005,7(3):305-306. 被引量:4
  • 3中华医学会.各类脑血管病诊断要点,神经功能缺损评分标准[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):376-382.
  • 4[1]McGill R, Torgerson WS. On the language of pain. Anesthesiology, 1971,34:50~59.
  • 5[2]McGill R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain, 1975, 1:277~299.
  • 6[4]Holroyd KA, Holm JE, Keefe FJ, et al. A multi-center evaluation of the McGill Pain Questionnaire: Results from more than 1700 chronic pain patients. Pain, 1992,48:301~311.
  • 7[5]Fernandez E,Towery S.A parsimonious set of verbal descriptors of pain sensation derived from the McGill Pain Questionnaire.Pain,1996,66:31~37.
  • 8[6]Zola IK. Culture and symptoms-an analysis of patients' presenting complaints. Am Sociol Rev 1966,31:615.
  • 9Nicholson BD.Evaluation and treatment of central pain syndromes[J].Neurology,2004,62:S30-S36.
  • 10Klit H,Finnerup NB,Jensen TS.Central post-stroke pain:clinical characteristics,pathophysiology,and management[J].Lancet Neurol.2009,8:857-868.

共引文献88

同被引文献32

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部