反映能力问卷中文版的信效度研究

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Reflective Function Questionnaire

目的:在大学生样本和临床样本中检验反映能力问卷中文版(Chinese Version of Reflective Function Questionnaire,RFQ-C)的信度和效度。方法:选取657名大学生和134例临床心理科的来访者填写RFQ-C,其中114名大学生在间隔1-2周后完成RFQ-C重测;采用人格障碍诊断问卷第4版中的边缘性人格障碍分量表、基本共情量表及多伦多述情障碍量表作为效标。结果:(1)大学生样本中,反映能力的Cronbach’sα系数为0.654,重测信度为0.687;反映能力与边缘性人格倾向存在显著负相关(r=-0.180)。(2)临床样本中,反映能力的Cronbach’sα系数为0.715;边缘性人格倾向组反映能力得分显著低于非边缘性人格倾向组,反映能力与边缘性人格倾向(r=-0.304)、述情障碍量表总分(r=-0.382)及其中的情感识别困难(r=-0.433)、情感描述困难(r=-0.311)均存在显著负相关;反映能力与认知共情相关显著(r=0.173)。结论:反映能力问卷中文版的信度和效度基本达到心理测量学的要求。

Objective： To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of Reflective Function Questionnaire （RFQ-C） in college students and counseling patients. Methods： 657 college students and 134 counseling patients completed the RFQ-C and a battery of self-reported questionnaires assessing borderline traits, alexithymia and empathy. Results： In college students, the Cronbach＇ sct coefficient of the RFQ-C was 0.654, the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.687. Significant negative correlations were found between the total score of RFQ-C and borderline trait（z=-0.180）. In counseling patients, the Cronbach＇s ct coefficient of the RFQ-C was 0315. Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder（BPD） tenden- cy had significantly lower total scores of RFQ-C than patients without BPD tendency and the total score of RFQ-C was neg- atively correlated with borderline traits（r=-0.304）, alexithymia（r=-0.382） ＆ positively correlated with empathy（cognitive empathy only, r=-0.173）. Conclusion： Chinese Version of Reflective Function Questionnaire shows good reliability and validity and meets the needs of psychometric properties.