期刊文献+

认知行为治疗对未服药强迫障碍患者的大样本病例研究 被引量:10

Efficacy of Manual-based CBT for the Drug-naive Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Patients in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:验证操作手册指导下的认知行为治疗(CBT)对未服药强迫障碍(OCD)患者的疗效、可接受性及适用性。方法:纳入符合DSM-IV强迫障碍诊断标准的门诊患者46例,在CBT操作手册指导下进行为期12周共14次个别CBT治疗。应用耶鲁-布朗强迫量表(Y-BOCS)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17项)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)进行疗效评估,并采用0-10分的视觉模拟评分法来进一步评估患者对CBT的满意度和主观有益性。研究期间不服用任何精神药物。结果:39例患者完成了14次治疗(脱落率为15.22%),对完成治疗者进行治疗前后Y-BOCS,HAMA,HAMD分值的配对t检验,结果具有显著性差异(P均小于0.01)。按照意向性治疗统计方法,有效率为69.57%(32/46),完全缓解率为21.74%(10/46),OCD患者对CBT治疗的满意度为6.89±0.42,主观有益性为6.62±0.68。结论:手册指导下的单一CBT治疗对中国OCD患者具有较好的疗效,且可接受性高,治疗依从性好。 Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of manual-based cognitive behavioral therapy(CBT) for obsessive-com- pulsive disorder(OCD). Methods: 46 patients who met the DSM-1V OCD criteria were recruited to receive CBT. The CBT intervention was based on a manual, including 14 sessions across 12 weeks. All participants were assessed with the Yale- Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale(Y-BOCS), Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA) by psychiatrists not involved in the treatment. Perceived helpfulness and satisfaction with CBT were also assessed by visual an- alogue scale(0-10). All patients did not take any psychiatric drugs during the CBT process. Results: 39 subjects completed 14 sessions CBT. The dropout rate was 15.22%. At the end of the therapy, significant improvements were found for Y- BOCS, HAMD and HAMA by paired t test(P〈0.01). Based on the intention to treat principle, the response and complete re- mission rate were 69.57% (32/46) and 21.74%(10/46). Satisfaction and helpfulness ratings were acceptable. Conclusion: The manual-based CBT is an effective and feasible therapy for drug naive OCD patients in China. The patients' compliance is good in this therapy.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第2期299-303,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(白质与强迫障碍:认知行为治疗的靶点与机制81271493) 国家自然科学主任基金(强迫障碍认知行为治疗的神经影像学研究81141016)
关键词 认知行为治疗 强迫障碍 疗效 可接受性 Obsessive-compulsive disorder Cognitive behavior therapy Efficacy Feasibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献61

共引文献141

同被引文献77

引证文献10

二级引证文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部