期刊文献+

2017年中国大学及学科专业评价的创新与结果分析 被引量:7

The Research and Innovation of Chinese University and Discipline Evaluation Results(2017)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近日中国科学评价研究中心完成2017年中国大学及学科专业评价工作。本次评价在以往评价实践基础上,继续从四个方面进行创新:拓展评价对象、优化评价体系、完善分类评价、注重声誉影响。本次评价对全国2581所高校的竞争力进行了评价,生成617个榜单,并重点分析了中国一流大学竞争力排行榜、中国重点大学竞争力排行榜等八个榜单,研究得出以下结论:我国各地区本科教育竞争力的差异较大,排名相对稳定;一流大学排名变化较小,一般大学和民办院校发展较快;重点大学的投入和产出明显增加,国际化程度仍有待提高;各类高校应突出自身特色和学科优势,提高专业学科优秀率。 Recently Research Center for China Science Evalution(RCCSE) has completed the evaluation of Chinese university and discipline(2017). RCCSE based on original evaluation experience bring forth new ideas in four as- pects, that is, expand evaluation objects, optimize evaluation program, rationalize evaluation classification and em- phasize reputation effects. The evaluation of 2017 contains totally 2581 universities inland and produces 617 lists. Meanwhile RCCSE analyzes particularly 8 lists among them, including the list of Chinese first--rate univeristies, the list of national key universities, etc. There are conclusions that the rankings of undergraduate education in our country is relatively stable but exist gap among different regions. The fluetuation is small among first--rate universities but large in general universities as well as private colleges. The input and output of key universities increases significantly but internationalization remains to be improved. All kinds of colleges and universities should highlight their own characteristic and advantage, improve their discipline proficiency.
出处 《评价与管理》 2017年第1期38-50,59,共14页 Evaluation & Management
关键词 大学评价 中国一流大学 大学排名 教育评价 专业评价 university evaluation Chinese first rate universities university ranking education evaluation disciplineevaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献9

共引文献23

同被引文献28

引证文献7

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部