期刊文献+

苹果“天价”税单背后的欧盟国家援助制度评析 被引量:5

A Review on the EU State Aid Law regarding the Apple Case
原文传递
导出
摘要 自2013年6月起,欧盟一直在紧锣密鼓地调查转让定价税收裁定是否符合欧盟国家援助法的问题。2016年8月,欧盟宣布苹果公司位于爱尔兰的两家子公司所获得的税收裁定构成非法国家援助,判决爱尔兰从苹果补缴大约130亿欧元的税款和利息。本文试图对苹果"天价"税单背后的欧盟国家援助制度进行介绍,并简要分析其对我国的税收影响和我国应采取的立场与对策。 Since June 2013, the European Union has been investigating whether the tax rulings of transfer pricing are in line with the EU Aid Law. In August 2016, the EU concluded that the tax rulings of two Irish subsidiaries of Apple constituted the illegal state aid, and the Apple Corp. was pronounced paying tax and interests of 13 billion euro. The paper introduces the EU State Aid Scheme involved with the Apple case and then briefly analyzes the impact on China's tax policy as well as the standpoint and counter-measures China shall take.
出处 《国际税收》 北大核心 2017年第4期28-34,共7页 International Taxation In China
关键词 欧盟 国家援助 苹果税案 EU State aid Apple case
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献49

  • 1EU Commision,Commission Decides Selective Tax Advantages for Fiat in Luxembourg and Starbucks in the Neth-erlands are Illegal under EU State Aid Rules,21 October 2015, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5880_en.htm, last accessed on 25 January 2016.
  • 2欧盟成员国税收立法权受到限制的条约基础是《欧洲共同体条约》第93条和94条.
  • 3See Government of the Netherlands Website, https://www.govemment.nl/ministries/rninistry~of-finance/news/2015/11/27/govemment-appeais-the-decision-in-the-starbucks-case, last accessed on 25 January 2016.
  • 4.U Commision, EU Competition Law-Rules Applicable to State Aidt EU 2014, ISBN 978-92-79-35609-4.
  • 5Case C- 30/59,Gezamenlijke Steenkolenmijnen in Limburg v High Authority, 23 February 1961.
  • 6EU Commision, State Aid Scorboard 2014, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/scoreboard/graph9.jpg,last accessed on 25 January 2016.
  • 7EU Commision,Commission Notice on the Application of the State Aid Rules to Measures Relating to Direct Busi-ness Taxation,OJ C 384, 10 December. 1998.
  • 8Claire Micheau, Tax Selectivity in European Law of State Aid: Legal Assessment and Alternative Approaches, Eu-ropean Law Review, June 2015 , p. 323; Cristina Romariz, Revisiting Material Selectivity in EU State Aid Law-Or TheGhost of Yet-To-Come,European State Aid Law Quarterly, 2014,p.39.
  • 9Case 0338/11,Santander Asset Management SGIIC 5/4 v. Directeur des residents d I,Stranger et des servicesgin^raux, 10 May 2012.
  • 10EU Commision, Commission Regulation 1998/2006 of 15 December 2006 on the Application of Articles 87 and 88of the Treaty to de minimis Aid, OJ L. 379/5,28 December 2006.

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部