期刊文献+

白细胞介素-1β基因T-31C多态性与牙周炎易感性的Meta分析 被引量:2

Meta-Analysis of Association Between Interleukin-1β T-31C Polymorphism and Chronic Periodontitis Susceptibility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:应用Meta分析的方法评价白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)基因T-31C多态性与牙周炎易感性之间的关系。方法:全面检索PubMed、Embase和中国知网,检索时间截至2016年5月26日。由2位研究者独立筛选文献和提取数据后,采用Comprehensive Meta-Analysis v2软件进行Meta分析。结果:最终纳入8项病例-对照研究,结果显示5种基因模型均未发现IL-1β基因T-31C多态性与牙周炎易感性之间存在相关性。敏感性分析证实总体结果稳健性良好,亚组分析与总体研究的结果也基本一致。结论:当前证据尚不能证实IL-1β基因T-31C多态性与牙周炎易感性之间存在相关性。 Objective:To investigate the association between interleukin-1β(IL-1β)T-31 Cpolymorphism and periodontitis risk using a meta-analysis.Methods:A comprehensive literature search from PubMed,Embase and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure up to May 26,2016 was made.Two authors selected the studies and extracted data,and then the meta-analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis v2 software.Results:Finally eight case-control studies were yielded.All five genetic models revealed non-significant association between the IL-1βT-31 Cpolymorphism and periodontitis risk.Sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were robust and the subgroup analysis yielded similar results.Conclusion:Based on current evidence,the IL-1βT-31 C polymorphism was not associated with PD susceptibility in overall population.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第4期386-389,共4页 Journal of Oral Science Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:81302508)
关键词 白细胞介素-1 牙周炎 牙周病 基因多态性 META分析 Interleukin-1 Periodontitis Polymorphism Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献16

  • 1Jadad AR,Cook DJ,Browman GP. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews[J]. CMAJ,1997,156(10):1411-6.
  • 2Dixon E,Hameed M,Sutherland F,et al. Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal[J]. Ann Surg,2005,241(3):450-9.
  • 3Moher D,Cook DJ,Eastwood S,et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials:the QUOROM statement. Qnality of Reporting of Meta-analyses[J]. Lancet,1999,3 54(9193): 1896-900.
  • 4Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement[J]. J Ctin Epidemiol,2009,62(10): 1006-12.
  • 5Higgins JPT,Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011[J]. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 6Stroup DF,Berlin JA,Morton SC,et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology:a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group[J]. JAMA,2 000,283(15):2008-12.
  • 7Delaney A,Bagshaw SM,Ferland A,et al. A systematic evaluation ofthe quality of recta-analyses in the critical care literature[J]. Crit Care,2005,9(5):R575-82.
  • 8Wen J,Ren Y,Wang L,et al. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study[J]. J Clin Epidemiol,2008,61(8): 770-5.
  • 9Mrkobrada M,Thiessen-Philbrook H,Haynes RB,et al. Need for quality improvement in renal systematic reviews[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol,2008,3(4):1102-14.
  • 10Liberati A,Ahman DG,Tetzlaff J,et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions:explanation and elaboration[J]. PLoS Med,2009,6(7):e 1000100.

共引文献43

同被引文献16

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部