期刊文献+

浅议阿里巴巴合伙人制度

下载PDF
导出
摘要 阿里巴巴选择到美国上市的根本原因是因为马云坚持同股不同权,以此来保护创始人对公司的控制权;而中国香港认为此制度违背了其一贯坚持的"同股同权",不符合相关上市规定。阿里巴巴在美国上市成功,刷新了IPO交易最大规模。本文阐述了阿里巴巴不在国内上市的原因,详细分析了阿里合伙人的"同股不同权"制度,并对阿里合伙人制度的优缺点进行了归纳,从中得到创新启示。
作者 杨慧
出处 《河北企业》 2017年第5期83-84,共2页
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献62

  • 1[美]伯利,米恩斯.《现代公司与私有财产》,甘华呜等译,商务印书馆2005年版,第360页.
  • 2Terence Zinger, "Dual-Class Share Structures, Founder Control and Enterprise Growth: New In- sights and Directions for Research", 1 Entrepreneurial Practice Review,54(2009).
  • 3Alchian, Armen Albert, "Corporate Management and Property Rights",10 Economic Policy and the Regulation of Securities, 337-336(1969).
  • 4Michel Magnan, Samer Khalil, "Dual-Class Shares: Governance, Risks and Rewards", May/June Ivey Business Journey ,64(2007).
  • 5Adolf A. Berle, "Non-Voting Stock and Bankers Control (1925-1926) ", 39 Harvard Law Re- view, 673(1926).
  • 6Arthur Stone Dewing, The Financial Policy of Corporations, The Fronald Press, 1953, p.178.
  • 7William Z. Ripley, Main Street and Wall Street, The New Republic Press, 1927, pp. 360-368.
  • 8Adolf A.Berle, "Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust", Harvard Law Review, p. 1049 (1931).
  • 9W. H. S. Stevens, "Voting Rights of Capital Stock and Shareholders", 4 The Journal of Business of the University of Chicago, 311-348 (1938).
  • 10New York Times headline, "President Studies Non-Voting Stocks: He Confers With Professor Ri- pley to Learn if Federal Action is Advisable", New York Times, February 17,1926.

共引文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部