期刊文献+

面向行人安全的保险杠结构改进优化 被引量:2

Bumper structure optimization for pedestrian leg protection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对行人下肢的碰撞保护,建立了某车型的有限元碰撞模型并进行了试验验证。为改善行人保护性能,提出了添加吸能泡沫及副保险杠的改进方案。以吸能泡沫厚度、主副保险杠垂向距离、副保险杠壁厚这3个结构参数为设计变量,构造了优化的拉丁超立方试验,结合最小二乘法建立胫骨加速度、膝关节弯曲角度及剪切位移3个伤害指标的响应面模型,运用多目标遗传算法进行优化求解。对比结果表明,优化后的结构有效地降低了行人腿部受到的伤害,满足了安全法规要求。 A finite element collision model was established to simulate the collision between pedestrian's lower leg and a car, and it was verified through experiment. In order to improve the performance of pedestrian protection, auxiliary bumper and energy-absorption foam were added in the car. With taking the thickness of energy-absorption foam, the vertical distance between bumper and auxiliary bumper and the thickness of auxiliary bumper as design variables, an optimized Latin hypercube experiment was conducted. The response surface model (RSM) for the injury index of leg was fit with experimental data by using the least square method, and the optimal design genetic algorithm (MOGA). The results indicate that t pa he rameter of bumper was solved by multi objective injury of the pedestrian leg is reduced effectively by using the optimal structure, which meets the safety requirements.
出处 《重庆大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第4期1-8,共8页 Journal of Chongqing University
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费科研专项(CDJZR14115501)~~
关键词 行人安全 保险杠 拉丁超立方 多目标遗传算法 pedestrian safety automobile bumper Latin hypercube MOGA
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献40

  • 1李莉,杨济匡,李伟强,方海峰,赵智.汽车碰撞行人交通伤害特点分析[J].汽车工程,2005,27(1):44-46. 被引量:32
  • 2张立新,隋允康,高学仕,付志远.基于响应面方法的结构碰撞优化[J].力学与实践,2005,27(3):35-39. 被引量:16
  • 3廖兴涛,张维刚,李青,钟志华.响应表面法在薄壁构件耐撞性优化设计中的应用研究[J].工程设计学报,2006,13(5):298-302. 被引量:20
  • 4Kodiyalamodiyalam S, Yang R J, Gu I., et al. Multidisciplinary design optimization of a vehicle system in a scalable, high performance computing environment[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2004, 26(3-4): 256-263.
  • 5Forsberg J, Nilsson L. On polynomial response surface and Kriging for use in structural optimization of erashworthiness[J]. Struct Multidisc Optim, 2005, 29(3) : 232-243.
  • 6Redhe M, Forsberge J,Janssone T, et al. Using the response surface methodology and the D-optimality criterion in erashworthiness related problems[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2002, 24(3) : 185-194.
  • 7Kurtaran H, Eskandarian A, Marzougui D, et al. Crashworthiness design optimization using successive response surface approximations [J].Computational Mechanics, 2002,29: 409-421.
  • 8Liu G R, Han X. Computational inverse techniques in nondestructive evaluation[M]. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 2003.
  • 9Schuler S,Mooijman F.Bumper Systems Designed for Both Pedestrian Protection and FMVSS Requirements[C].SAE 2003 World Congress,Detroit,Michigan,2003.
  • 10GRSP (WP.29).Proposal for a Global Technical Regulation on Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with Regard to Their Construction in Order to Improve the Protection and Mitigate the Severity of Injuries to Pedestrians and Other Vulnerable Road Users in the Event of a Collision[S].TRANS/WP.29/GRSP,2006.2.

共引文献27

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部