期刊文献+

微创小切口手术治疗单纯性阑尾炎的临床效果 被引量:12

Clinical effect of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of simple appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探索研究采用微创小切口手术治疗单纯性阑尾炎患者的临床效果。方法选取我院2013年1月~2015年9月收治的120例单纯性阑尾炎患者,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组60例。观察组进行微创小切口手术治疗,对照组进行常规开腹手术治疗。比较两组患者的手术情况、术后恢复情况以及术后并发症。结果两组各手术指标比较,观察组患者手术时间较对照组短,术中出血量较对照组少,术后肛门排气时间较对照组短,观察组住院时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率5.00%低于对照组18.75%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用微创小切口手术治疗单纯性阑尾炎手术效果良好,患者术后恢复快,手术并发症少,值得在临床中进行推广应用。 Objective To explore the clinical effect of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of simple appendicitis. Methods 120 patients with simple appendicitis from January 2013 to September 2015 were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group.60 cases in the observation group were treated with minimally invasive surgery,60 cases in the control group were treated.with.conventional open surgery.The operation, postoperative recovery and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time of observation group was shorter than that in the control group,the amount of intraoperative bleeding of observation group was less than that of the control group,the postoperative anal exhaust time of observation group was shorter than that of the control group,the laospital time of observation group was shorter than that of control group (P 〈 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 5.00%, which was lower than that in the control group with 18.75%(P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The effect of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of simple appendicitis surgery is good.The patient recovers quickly after operation.There are less complications.It has the value of clinical application.
作者 黄眷杰 胡艳
出处 《中国医药科学》 2017年第6期129-131,共3页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词 单纯性阑尾炎 微创小切口手术 治疗 Simple appendicitis Minimally invasive surgery Treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献81

  • 1刘志勇.小切口阑尾手术用于老年阑尾炎的临床疗效[J].中文科技期刊数据库(引文版)医药卫生,2015,1(8):48-48. 被引量:1
  • 2唐凯.用小切口阑尾切除术治疗78例老年阑尾炎患者的疗效分析[J].求医问药(下半月),2013(9):74-75. 被引量:19
  • 3Anne,Winter.Abandoned in Brussels,delivered in Paris:long-dis- tance transports of unwanted children in the eighteenth century [J].J Fam Hist, 2010,35 (3) : 232-248.
  • 4Greenberg JP.Assessing policy effects on enrollment in early child- hood education and care[J].Soc Serv Rev, 2010,84 (3) : 461-470.
  • 5王小军,张一中,帅勇锋.从Iconport单孔装置50例应用经验浅谈阑尾炎的术式选择[J].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2015,8(2):123-127.
  • 6Gorter RR,van der Lee JH,Cense HA,et al.Initial antibiotic treatment for acute simple appendicitis in children is safe:Short-term results from a multicenter,prospective cohort study[J].Surgery,2015,157(5):916-923.
  • 7Jen HC, Shew SB. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomyin children: outcomes comparison based on a statewideanalysis[J]. J Surg Res, 2010,161(1): 13-17.
  • 8Addiss DG, Shaffer N,Fowler BS, et al. The epidemiologyof appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States[J].Am J Epidemiol, 1990,132(5): 910-925.
  • 9Kargar S, Mirshamsi MH, Zare M, et al. Laparoscopicversus open appendectomy; which method to choose? Aprospective randomized comparison[J]. Acta Med Iran,2011,49(6): 352-356.
  • 10Nguyen NT, Zainabadi K, Mavandadi S, et al. Trendsin utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus openappendectomy [J]. Am J Surg, 2004,188(6): 813-820.

共引文献157

同被引文献57

引证文献12

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部