摘要
改革开放后,袁世凯研究快速走上了实事求是的科学道路。但是,也存在一些不尽如人意的地方,有研究者把袁世凯捧成辛亥革命的"共和元勋",认为他不是"伺机而出"的"阴谋家","养寇"也只是为了实行"宪政"。他还承担起了"终结帝制的使命",又是一个坚守"道德"底线的人,并不存在"逼宫"的问题。这些理由,不但方法上犯了割断历史、自相矛盾的常识性错误,也无真实可靠的事实依据,没有一条是站得住的。事实再一次证明,历史不是任人打扮的小姑娘,历史是客观存在,无人可以随意改变。
The studies on Yuan Shi - kai embarked on a scientific path of seeking truth from facts, but there still exist some deficiencies. Some scholars think that Yuan Shi - kai was not a conspirator but the father of the 1911 Revolution as well as the terminator of the feudal society. He did not force the emperor to abdicate for he was a man with his own moral bottom line. These opinions are unreal, unreliable and completely wrong. Fact proves that history is an objective existence, and none can change at will.
出处
《河北学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期53-61,共9页
Hebei Academic Journal
关键词
袁世凯
孙中山
辛亥革命
共和元勋
Yuan Shi-kai
Sun Yat-sen
the 1911 Revolution
the father of the 1911 Revolution