摘要
本文以中国农作物秸秆资源化利用补偿政策为例,采用条件价值评估方法分别在两种补偿方式(以农户为补偿单位和以耕地面积为补偿单位)下评估了农户的受偿意愿。结果显示,两种补偿方式下估算的农户受偿意愿存在显著差异。农户资源化处理农作物秸秆的边际成本递减、环境价值对农户的边际效用递减以及农户对补偿方式变化的不敏感性,是造成这一差异的主要原因。对补偿政策熟悉程度或认知水平更高的农户在两种补偿方式下的受偿意愿具有更强的一致性。在此基础上,本文建议政府在实施秸秆资源化利用补偿政策之前,应该着力于提高农户对补偿政策的认知,并重视秸秆产量更高的农户。
Taking China＇s compensation policy on agricultural wastes recycling as example, this article uses the contingent valuation method to conduct an empirical analysis on farmer＇s willingness to accept （WTA） based on two compensation approaches, namely, household as compensation unit and farmland as compensation unit. The results reveal a significant difference in WTA between these two approaches, and the WTA elicited ~om the latter approach is shown to be higher than that from the former one. The reasons for the remarkable difference are found to be diminishing marginal costs of recycling wastes, diminishing marginal utility of environmental valuation and respondents＇ insensitivity on compensation approaches. The farmers who have a greater awareness of the compensation policy represent a more consistent WTA between the two approaches. The study concludes with policy implications.
出处
《中国农村经济》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第4期13-29,共17页
Chinese Rural Economy
基金
农业部软科学课题项目"农业废弃物资源化利用问题研究"(课题编号:201512)的资助
关键词
农业废弃物
条件价值评估
补偿标准
受偿意愿
双边界二分选择
Agricultural Wastes
Contingent Valuation
Compensation Criteria
Willingness to Accept
Double Bounded Dichotomous Choice
