期刊文献+

美国儿童养育的“学校化”——对“家长参与”政策的工具理性的评析 被引量:12

The “Schoolization” of Parenting in America:Analyse the Instrumental Rationality of the Policies of Parental Involvement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪60年代至今,美国家长参与政策致力于将家长参与学校教育涵盖所有家庭。基于学校教育与经济成功关系框架的家长参与政策已经将家庭视为一种工具,而非独立的教育系统。政策以学业成绩为起点,通过确立家长问责框架、建构家长参与能力以及家长参与方式建模和普及化等路径,不断将家长参与学校教育作为一种"好的儿童养育"予以强化,以此促使家长"专业地"履行养育职责。在政策框架下,儿童养育的内涵被"学校化",家长与儿童之间的关系被"对象化",这意味着家校合作时代背景下的一种家校关系扭曲。 Since the 1960's, American federal policies of parental involvement are striving to include all families. Based on the relationship between schooling and economic success, families have been regarded as an instrument rather than an independent education system by these policies. The policies centralize the students' academic achievement, define parental involvement in schooling as a "good parenting" through assigning parents responsibility, building the capacity of involvement, and implementing model approaches to improve parental involvement, and urge parents to carry out parenting responsibilities "professionally". However, the parenting has been "schoolization", and the relation between parents and children has been "objectification". All these policies mean a distortion of the relationship between family and school.
作者 卫沈丽
出处 《外国中小学教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期29-35,28,共8页 Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad
关键词 美国 家长参与政策 儿童养育 “学校化” 工具理性 America policies of parental involvement~ parenting "schoolization" instrumental rationality
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1龙献忠.论高等教育多中心治理的参与协商机制[J].高等工程教育研究,2004,52(5):53-55. 被引量:17
  • 2薄启亮,刘贵洲,麦巍.绩效管理的核心流程[J].中国人才,2005(03S):50-51. 被引量:6
  • 3R.J.S Macpherson.(1996).Educative Accountability:Theory,Practice,Policy and Research in Educational Administration.Oxford,U.K.:Pergamon,44.
  • 4黄振球.绩优学校与绩效责任.中等教育,1999,(6):14-14.
  • 5黄哲彬.论推动学校绩效责任之执行策略[N].教育趋势导报,2004-5-8(5).
  • 6Kenneth Leithwood & Lorna Earl.Accountability In Education:Four Models.http://www.mcle.ws/notebookvol 13no2.pdf.2006-02-04.
  • 7吴政达.教育绩效责任之内涵与运作.教育研究月刊(台湾),(96):34-34.
  • 8Williamson M.Evers &Herbert J.Walberg.Accountability Models.Standford University Press,c2002:pp74-75.
  • 9Mark E.Fetler.Carrot or Stick?How Do School Performance Reports Work?Educational Policy Analysis Archives,Vol2,No.13.1994 (10).http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v2n 13.html.2005-11-24.
  • 10Daniel L.Stufflebeam,George F.Madaus&Thomas Kellaghan.评鉴模式:教育及人力服务的评鉴观点[M].台北:高等教育出版社,苏锦丽等译.2005.390.

共引文献23

引证文献12

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部