期刊文献+

京津冀交通控制温室气体和污染物的协同效应分析 被引量:11

Co-benefit Analysis of Greenhouse Gases and Local Air Pollutants Mitigation for Transportation Sector in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以京津冀道路和轨道交通为对象,以协同率作为量化指标,基于情景分析对京津冀"十三五"期间6项关键交通政策措施控制温室气体和空气污染物的协同效应大小进行计算。结果显示,发展城际高速或市郊铁路、加强公路路网建设的协同效应最大,分别为11.5和8.8/kg CO_2当量。实施严格的机动车排放控制对排放量的削减最大,由此可以减排3215万t CO_2当量和17.6万t空气污染物。该3项政策措施为京津冀交通能源环境与应对气候变化综合管理的推荐措施。发展城市轨道交通不削减排放,协同效应最小,但是在提高城市交通运输效率,以及缓解城市拥堵方面的作用优于减碳控污。 This paper focuses on analyzing the co-benefit of GHGs and air pollutants mitigation for transportation sector in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. In order to quantify co-benefit, a parameter called synergistic rate and the technique of scenario analysis are used to assess different measures and policies. We have selected six key measures of road and rail transportation sector in this region. Quantification results reveal that two measures, development of inter- city high-speed/suburban railways and enhancement of highway network, have the highest synergistic rates, which are 11.5 and 8.8 per kilometers CO2-eq. The measures of implementation strict emission standards on motor vehicles could reduce 32.1 million tons of CO2-eq and 176 thousand tons of air pollutants, which rank the first among all measures. These three measures are supposed to be the best practice in dealing with energy, environment and climate change issues of transportation sector in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. The paper also proves that development of urban railways is more helpful to ease traffic congestion than mitigate GHGs and air pollutions.
出处 《中国能源》 2017年第4期25-31,共7页 Energy of China
关键词 温室气体 空气污染物 情景分析 协同效应 Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) Air Pollutants Scenario Analysis Co-benefit
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献41

  • 1樊东方,石静远.日本交通运输管理体制的特征及其借鉴[J].工程研究(跨学科视野中的工程),2013,5(4):443-452. 被引量:8
  • 2郝吉明,傅立新,贺克斌,等.城市机动车排放污染控制--国际经验分析与中国的研究成果[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2000.
  • 3Anilovich I,Hakkert A S.Survey of vehicle emission in Israel related to vehicle age and periodic inspection[J].The Science of the Total Environment,1996 (189/190):197-203.
  • 4Callagher J,Livo R.Emission and age distribution of vehicle in the Colorado I/M program-Winter 1989-1990[G].SAE Technical Papers No.910336,1991.
  • 5U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.Federal Test ProcedureReview Project:Preliminary Technical Report[R].U.S.EPA Report,EPA 420-R-93-007,1993.
  • 6National Research Council.Modeling Mobile-Source Emissions[M].Washington D.C.:National Academy Press,2000.
  • 7Holmen A B,Niemeier A D.Characterizing the effects of driver variability on real-world vehicle emissions[J].Transportation Research Part D,1998(3):117-128.
  • 8Hansen J Q,Winther M,Sorenson S C.The influence of driving patterns on petrol passenger car emission[J].The Science of the Total Environment,1995(169):129-139.
  • 9Cernuschi S,Giugliano M,Cemin A,et al.Modal analysis of vehicle emission factors[J].The Science of the Total Environment,1995(169):175-183.
  • 10Gertler W A,Sagebiel C J,Dippel A W,et al.The Impact of California Phase 2 Reformulated Gasoline on Real-World Vehicle Emissions[J].Journal of Air & Waste Management Association,1999(49):1339-1346.

共引文献85

同被引文献145

引证文献11

二级引证文献137

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部