期刊文献+

P2P软件开发者著作权侵权责任认定分析

Analysis of P2P Software Developer's Copyright Tort Liability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 P2P技术的兴起与发展,改变传统的以大网站为中心的C/S模式,在文件资源共享上发挥巨大的优势,但大量互联网用户利用这一技术分享交换享有著作权的作品,极大侵害著作权人的利益,各方的利益失衡矛盾日渐显现。在这样的背景下,对P2P软件开发者应该如何认定其侵权责任,如何实现著作权人与促进技术进步的利益最大化呢?在分析P2P理论及P2P典型著作权侵权案件的基础上,对P2P软件开发者的著作权侵权责任认定问题作出分析。 The rise and development of P2P technology change the traditional C/S model featured the central large site, and have played a huge ad- vantage in the file resource sharing, but a large number of Internet users share the copyright works by using the P2P technology, which great infringes the interests of the copyright owner. The interests between the parties are increasingly imbalance. In this context, how should P2P software developers determine their tort liability, how to maximize the interests of copyright owners and the progress of tech- nology? Based on the analysis of P2P theory and typical copyright infringement cases, analyzes the copyright infringement liability of P2P software developers.
出处 《现代计算机》 2017年第8期60-63,84,共5页 Modern Computer
关键词 P2P P2P软件提供者 著作权 侵权责任 P2P P2P Software Provider Copyright Tort Liability
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献12

  • 1王迁.P2P软件最终用户版权侵权问题研究[J].知识产权,2004,14(5):9-13. 被引量:36
  • 2王迁.新型P2P技术对传统版权间接侵权责任理论的挑战——Grokster案评述[J].电子知识产权,2004(11):30-33. 被引量:9
  • 3王迁.“索尼案”二十年祭——回顾、反思与启示[J].科技与法律,2004(4):59-68. 被引量:57
  • 4Sony Corporation of America et al. v. Universal City Studios, Inc,. et al. 464 U.S. 417 at 431 (1984).at 89.
  • 5Inducing Infringement of Copyrights Act of 2004, S.2560, 108th Congress (June 22, 2004).
  • 6Statement of Marybeth Peters, Register of Copyrights,Hearing on S.2560, the International Inducement of Copyright Infringements Act of 2004, Committee on the Judiciary(Senate, July 22, 2004).
  • 7Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc., Petitioners v. Grokster, Ltd., 2005 U.S. LEXIS 5212, at 36-37.at 36, 48.at 38.at 18-21.at 21-22.at 45.at 22-23, 45.at 23, 46.at 18.at 42, 47.at 46, n12.
  • 8Amicus Curiae, U.S Internet Service Provider Association, p.6,RIAA v.Verizon, 240. F. Supp.2d 24, at 31.
  • 9David Nimmer,Nimmer on Copyright,Matthew Bender & Company, Inc Chapter 12.04 [A] [2], Chapter 13(2003).
  • 10A&M Records, Inc v. Napster, 239 F.3d 1004 at.1022(9th Cir. 2001).at.1023.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部