期刊文献+

对日本乒坛新秀伊藤美诚主要技术指标统计分析与研究 被引量:16

The Main Technical Indicators Statistical Analysis and Research for Japan's Table-tennis Rookie Mima Ito
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用文献资料、录像统计、四段指标评估等研究方法,对日本乒坛新秀伊藤美诚在2015年至2016年3月以来的八场国际重大比赛视频进行观察和统计,并对主要技术指标进行细化研究。结果表明:在发球轮上,伊藤美诚发球质量较高,直接得分效果明显,但在个别场次第三、第五拍失分较多,主要是正手抢攻质量不高,击球不稳。在相持I段上整体技战术运用效果较好,占据一定优势,近台相持球要好于中远台相持球。在接球轮上,伊藤美诚接发球技术过于单一,控球技术不够严密,导致接抢段(第二、四拍)乃至相持Ⅱ段(第八拍)技术失分较为严重,出现被动防守局面。在四段技术指标上伊藤美诚整体出现得分率低,使用率过高的现象。通过技术诊断,伊藤美诚在发球轮是主要得分手段,得分贡献率要稍好于对手,但差异不太显著,导致伊藤美诚整体竞技实力不足主要是在接球轮,也是造成比赛失利的重要原因。 This paper is about the main technical indicators statistical analysis and research of Japans table-tennis rookie Mima Ito,which is based on the observation and statistics of Itos eight major international games video from march in 2015 to 2016,and the detailed study on the main technical indicators,by means of literature methods,video statistics,four index evaluation method,etc.Mima Ito got scores more easily with her high quality serve in combination with drop shot and long ball,but she lost some scores at the third and fifth shot in some match because of her less powerful forehand rushing attack and relying too much on the backhand.In the stalemate I,Ito took an advantage with the good use of overall technique and tactics.Although her speed gave her some priority in the close-table forehand attack,her hit was not strong enough in the middle-long table.Ito lost the edge and was in a passive defense situation due to her single receive technique and loose ball control.It means Ito lost points seriously(the second,fourth shot)and stalemate II(the eighth shot),which is also the important attribution of the defeat.Mima Ito got a overall low scoring average with a high usage rate of four technical indicators.It is found that Itos scoring contribution rate surpassed her rivals a little when she served(serve,stalemate I)and weakened her whole competitive strength when she received(receive,stalemate II).
出处 《南京体育学院学报(自然科学版)》 2017年第1期89-94,共6页 Joournal of Nanjing Institute of Physical Education:Natural Science
关键词 乒乓球 伊藤美诚 得失分 四段指标评估 table tennis Mima Ito get,lose points four index evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1吴焕群.第40届世界乒乓球锦标赛观察报告——中国、瑞典、南朝鲜男子团体技术实力简析[J].中国体育科技,1989,25(8):21-29. 被引量:1
  • 2孟范生,曾倩,张涛,张忠新.排球进攻战术水平的诊断与评定[J].上海体育学院学报,2002,26(2):58-62. 被引量:22
  • 3吴焕群 李振彪 陶志翔 等.乒乓球比赛中实力与技术诊断的方法及其应用效果.国家体委科学研究所学报,1989,(1):32-32.
  • 4吴焕群 李振彪.乒乓球运动员技术诊断方法的研究.乒乓世界,1990,(2):39-42.
  • 5赵传杰,张辉.击剑比赛技战术分析理论与实践[M].北京:人民体育出版社,2010.
  • 6张辉.冯天薇技战术特征分析[R].成都:国家乒乓球女队奥运备战分析报告,2014.
  • 7李今亮,苏丕仁.对部分世界优秀男子乒乓球进攻型选手技术实力的评估:兼谈十项指标评估法的建立[J].北京休育学院学报,1998,21(4):71-76.
  • 8ZHANG H, LIU W, HU J, et al. Evaluation of elite table tennis players' technique effectiveness[J].Joumal of Sports Sciences, 2013, 31 (14) : 1526-1534.
  • 9ZHANG H, LIU W, HU J,et al. Evaluation of elite table tennis players' technique effectiveness[J]. J Sports Sci, 2013,31 (14) : 1526-1534.
  • 10新浪网.国际乒联世界体育排名[EB/OL].(2016-03-10).http://info.sports.sina.com.cn/rank/ittf.php.

共引文献124

同被引文献66

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部