摘要
对主流经济学长期缺失空间维度的原因分析,主要基于学科属性和科学方法论两个视角。学科属性是对学科长期演进的本质和特征的概述,主流经济学长期缺少空间分析的深层原因是经济学演变中各种经济思想冲突与对立的结果,是新古典经济学功利主义占有主流位置的结果,所以对西方经济思想史脉络的梳理和发现是分析主流经济学长期缺失空间分析症结的最好方法和途径。科学方法论是学科发展的哲学基础,方法论差异决定两个学科的差异和研究范式的不同,也将导致"空间维度的缺失"。
Based on subject property and scientific methodology perspectives, the paper explores in depth the reasons for the lack of spatial dimension analysis of mainstream economics in the long term. Subject property is an overview of the nature and characteristics of subject's long-term evolution. The deep reason for the lack of spatial analysis in the mainstream economics is the result of various economic conflict and contradiction in the economic evolution. It is the result of the new classical economics utilitarianism occupying the main position. Therefore, the best method and approach to solve mainstream economics lack of spatial analysis for a long time is to comb and discover the western economic thought history. Methodology is the philosophical basis of scientific development of the discipline, and methodological differences determine the differences between two different disciplines and research paradigm, so it would also lead to lack of spatial dimension.
出处
《区域经济评论》
2017年第2期25-32,共8页
Regional Economic Review
关键词
经济地理学
规模报酬递增
新古典经济学
Economic Geography
Increasing Returns to Scale
Neoclassical Economics