期刊文献+

一元论与二元论:民法错误规制的辩证分析

One-layer Mistake Institute and Two-layer Mistake Institute:A Dialectical Analysis on the Mistake Institute of China's Civil Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为我国民法学上的通论,民法上的二元错误论自2005年以来遭受来自一元错误论的批判和解构。一元错误论在解构二元错误论的同时,完成了知识移植和知识体系的建构。然而,它对二元错误论的解构并不成功:作为其基础的错误概念难以成立;其制度缺陷令其较之二元错误论难称优越;其驳论与立论存在明显的不足。坚持传统民法上的二元错误论应是我国民法的不二之选,但此种坚持应以扩张错误概念和软化动机错误不可撤销之僵化规则体系为前提。 As a general principle of the civil laws of the People' s Republic of China, the two - layer mis-take institute has been confronted with criticism and deconstruction from the one -layer mistake institute since2005. And at the same time the one - layer mistake institute has completed its transplant of knowledge and con-struction of knowledge system. However, the deconstruction was not successful in that the fundamental conceptsthe one -layer mistake institute has not been fixed, it has certain institutional defects compared with the two -layer mistake institute, and its paradox and argumentation are obviously inadequate. It is a consistent idealchoice for China' s civil laws to insist on the two - layer mistake institute, but it should take as the premise therigid system in which expanding mistake concept and softening errors of motives should remain irrevocable.
作者 雷秋玉 LEI Oiuyu(Law School, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, Yunnan, Chin)
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第2期12-18,共7页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目"物债二分下的中间权利状态研究"(14BFX171)
关键词 一元论 二元论 内容错误 动机错误 公序良俗 交易基础理论 one - layer mistake institute, two - layer mistake institute, content mistake, errors of motives,public policy, transaction - based approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献134

共引文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部