期刊文献+

重症急性胰腺炎治疗中综合护理干预的效果分析 被引量:8

Comprehensive nursing intervention in treatment for severe acute pancreatitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨综合护理干预在重症急性胰腺炎患者治疗中的临床辅助效果。方法收集2015年10月至2016年10月本院收治的100例重症急性胰腺炎患者,随机分为对照组与实验组。对照组常规护理,实验组则加施综合护理干预,比较两组相关临床指标、临床事件、干预前后SAS、SDS评分与家属护理满意度。结果实验组腹胀恢复时间[(4.02±0.93)d]、腹痛恢复时间[(3.55±0.71)d]、感染消退时间[(10.33±1.64)d]、住院时间[(14.60±2.05)d]与总体临床事件发生率(28%)均显著性低于对照组[(5.73±0.89)d、(4.80±0.73)d、(13.29±1.96)d、(18.36±3.79)d和54%];干预后,实验组SAS与SDS评分分别为(38.63±8.73)和(39.11±7.57),均显著低于对照组的(53.19±9.15)和(53.76±9.42);实验组家属护理满意度显著优于对照组(76%比60%);差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论综合护理干预在重症急性胰腺炎患者治疗中的临床辅助效果显著,可提高满意度。 ObjectiveTo explore the clinical assistant effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in treatment for severe acute pancreatitis.Methods100 patients with severe acute pancreatitis admitted into our hospital from October, 2015 to October, 2016 were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group. The control group were routinely cared and the experimental group were intervened with comprehensive nursing care. The related clinical indicators, clinical events, SAS and SDS scores before and after intervention, and family nursing satisfaction were compared between these two groups.ResultsThe times for the recovery of abdominal distension and abdominal pain, infection disappearing time, and hospital stay were shorter and the total incidence of clinical events was lower in the experimental group than in the control group [ (4.02±0.93) d vs. (5.73±0.89) d, (3.55±0.71) d vs. (4.80±0.73) d, (10.33±1.64) d vs. (13.29±1.96) d, (14.60±2.05) d vs. (18.36±3.79) d, and 28% vs. 54%]. After the intervention, the scores of SAS and SDS were (38.63±8.73) and (39.11±7.57) in the experimental group and were (53.19±9.15) and (53.76±9.42) in the control group. The satisfaction rate of family care was 76% in the experimental group and was 60% in the control group. There were statistical differences between these two groups (all P 〈0.01).ConclusionComprehensive nursing intervention in treatment for severe acute pancreatitis is significantly effective and can improve the satisfaction.
作者 兰翠 鞠妍红
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2017年第9期1440-1442,共3页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 重症急性胰腺炎 综合护理 满意度 Severe acute pancreatitis Comprehensive care Satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献77

  • 1王本昆.清胰汤联合大黄煎剂灌肠治疗急性重症胰腺炎临床分析[J].青海医药杂志,2012,42(4):80-81. 被引量:3
  • 2张圣道,雷若庆.重症急性胰腺炎诊治指南[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(11):727-729. 被引量:1145
  • 3吴文源.焦虑自评量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:235-238.
  • 4汤毓华.汉密顿抑郁量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12.
  • 5汤毓华.汉密顿焦虑量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:253-255.
  • 6戴晓阳.常用心理评估量表手册[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2011:13-19.
  • 7SheehD JanarsJ BakrR 等 司天梅 舒良 孔庆梅 等译.简明国际神经精神访谈(中文版).中国心理卫生杂志,2009,:1-29.
  • 8世界卫生组织 范肖东 汪向东 于欣 等译.ICD-10精神与行为障碍分类[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1993.38-57.
  • 9舒良.自评抑郁量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:194-196.
  • 10Chagas MHN, Tumas V, Loureiro SR, et al. Validity of a Brazilian version of the Zung self-rating depression scale for screening of de- pression in patients with Parkinson's disease [ J]. Parkinsonism Re- lat Disnrd, 2010, 16(1) :42 -45.

共引文献3695

同被引文献79

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部