《大戴礼记》版本三题

Three Topics about the Version of Da Dai Li Ji

通过考察《大戴礼记》版本方面的三个争议性话题,认为《夏小正》虽为《隋书·经籍志》单独著录,但在《大戴礼记》中仍然存在。今本《大戴礼记》确为《隋书·经籍志》著录版本,它是部分亡佚后的残本,而不是卢辩节选本;由于当时书籍属于卷轴装,其残缺多以卷为单位;今本仅部分有注的情况,可能是后人将无注本与残缺的有注本合并的结果。明焦竑所著录的《大戴礼乔记》八卷,并非汉乔仁的著作,而是明人割截《大戴礼记》有注之八卷的结果,这与明人好造伪书的风气有关。

Through investigating three topics on the version of Da Dai Li Ji, we think that Xia Xiao Zheng was still in the Da Dai Li Ji although it was single described in Sui Zhi. Da Dai Li Ji we see now is the same as described in Sui Zhi, and is a remaining edition, not anthology by Lu Bian. The loss took volume as unit due to scroll bookbinding. In addition, it has notes partially probably because of combining with notes and without by later people. Da dai Li Qiao Ji noted by Jiao Hong was＇t wrote by Qiao Ren of Han Dynasty, but made by people of Ming Dynasty who intercepted the part with note. This was related to the the time ethos of making fake books.