2Glanzel W, Thijs B, Schubert A, et al. Subfield - specific Nor- malized Relative Indicators and a New Generation of Relational Charts: Methodological Foundations Illustrated on the Assessment of Institutional Research Performance [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2009, 78(1) : 165 -188.
3van Raan A F J. The Use of Bibliometric Analysis in Research Per- formanee Assessment and Monitoring of Interdisciplinary Scientific Developments [ J ]. Assessment Theory and Practice, 2003,1 ( 12 ) : 20 - 29.
4Schubert A, Braun T. Relative Indicators and Relational Charts for Comparative Assessment of Publication Output and Citation Impact [J]. Scientometrics, 1986, 9(5) : 281 -291.
5Schubert A, Braun T. Reference Standards for Citation Based As- sessments [J]. Scientometrics, 1993, 26(1): 21 -35.
6Vinkler P. The Case of Seientometricians with the "Absolute Rela- tive" Impact Indicator [ J ]. Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6 ( 2 ) : 254 - 264.
7Vinkler P. Model for Quantitative Selection of Relative Scientomet- rie Impact Indicators [ J]. Scientometrics, 1996, 36 (2) : 223 - 236.
8Waltman L, van Eck N J, van Leeuwen T N, et al. Towards a New Crown Indicator: Some Theoretical Considerations [ J ]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5 ( 1 ) : 37 -47.
9Leydesdorff L, Opthof T. Remaining Problems with the " New Crown Indicator" (MNCS) of the CWTS[J]. Journal oflnformet- tics, 2011,5(1): 224-225.
10Gingras Y, Lariviere V. There are Neither "King" nor "Crown" in Scientometrics: Comments on A Supposed "Alternative" Method of Normalization [J]. Journal of lnformetrics, 2011, 5 (1): 226- 227.
