期刊文献+

自我肯定在风险性信息传播中的作用研究

Too Much or To a Tee?Research on Self-Affirmation Effectiveness in Health-Risk Communication
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自我肯定能削弱人们对于风险性信息的心理防御,增强信息说服效果,但当前对自我肯定会否引发过度反应尚不明确。为此设计了随机分配实验,通过回归与显著性区域检验发现:(1)自我肯定对风险性信息说服的促进作用随着防御反应增强而增强;(2)在低相关性接收者中,自我肯定能增强信息在防御反应较强接收者中的说服效果,并削弱过度反应,如过度恐惧情况;(3)在相关性较高的接收者中,自我肯定增强说服的作用不甚明显,甚至存在加剧高相关与高防御接收者对信息反应不足的情况。检验了自我肯定对风险性信息说服效果的边界条件,对自我肯定与风险性信息沟通理论形成补充;且指出了应用自我肯定方法的适用对象。 Self-affirmation has been validated as an effective way to dampen the defensiveness of message recipients when facing the health-risk information designed to evoke fear to cease unhealthy behaviors. However, it has been unclear in current literature that whether self-affirmation is potential to introduce overreaction. With experiments and region-of-significance test method, the current study discovered that.(1) Self-affirmation exerted a stronger persuading effect in health-risk communication along with the increase in defensiveness. (2)In those message recipients with low relevance, sel^affir marion enhanced the persuasiveness of health-risk message when defensive reaction was high. In the meantime, it reduced the overreaction such as unnecessary fear. (3) In contrast, in those message re- cipients with high relevance, self-affirmation effect was either insignificant or even strengthened de- fensive reaction and decreased message persuasiveness when defensiveness was high. The present study discussed in details the boundary conditions of self-affirmation effect across distinct defensive- ness and relevance. And this study contributes to the self-affirmation and health-risk communication theories. In practice, the current study sheds lights on the suitable group for self-affirmation tactic.
作者 吕朋悦 赵红 LYU Pengyue ZHAO Hong(University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, Chin)
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期730-741,共12页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71302126)
关键词 自我肯定 乐观性偏差 防御反应 风险性信息 一类错误 二类错误 self-affirmation optimistic bias defensiveness health-risk message type error type error
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献50

  • 1庄锦英.论情绪的生态理性[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):809-816. 被引量:20
  • 2孙彦,李纾,殷晓莉.决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):721-726. 被引量:145
  • 3Averbeck, J. M., Jones, A., & Robertson, K. (2011). Prior knowledge and health messages: An examination of affect as heuristics and information as systematic processing for fear appeals. Southern Communication Journal, 76(1), 35-54.
  • 4Bateman, I., Dent, S., Peters, E., Slovic, P., & Starmer, C. (2007). The affect heuristic and the attractiveness of simple gambles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4), 365-380.
  • 5Bhullar, N., Hine, D., Marks, A., Davies, C., Scott, J., & Phillips, W. (in press). The affect heuristic and public support for three types of wood smoke mitigation policies.
  • 6Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Desenrtes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.
  • 7De Martino, B., Ktanaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313(5787), 684- 687.
  • 8Denseombe, M. (2010). The affect heuristic and perceptions of "the young smoker" as a risk object. Health, Risk and Society, 12(5), 425--440.
  • 9Dijker, A. J., & Koomen, W. (1996). Stereotyping and attitudinal effects under time prsure. Eurnpean Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 61-74.
  • 10DoMe, S., Keller, C., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Examining the relationship between affect and implicit associations: Implications for risk perception. Risk Analysis, 30(7), 1116-1128.

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部