期刊文献+

腹腔镜下结肠癌根治术的安全性及有效性研究 被引量:1

Research on Safety and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Radical Colectomy for Colon Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下结肠癌根治术的安全性及有效性。方法回顾性分析2011年1月至2012年1月期间传统开腹结肠癌根治术患者(对照组,56例)与2013年1月至2014年1月期间腹腔镜下结肠癌根治术患者(观察组,56例),比较两组患者临床指标、并发症发生率、术后肿瘤局部种植率与肿瘤转移率之间的差异。结果观察组患者手术时间、肠道排气时间、术后进食时间、术后镇痛时间、住院时间明显短于对照组,术中出血量明显少于对照组,平均活检淋巴结明显高于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组,两组比较差异具有显著性(P<0.05),全部患者均未发生术后大出血、吻合口瘘、大便失禁、排尿障碍等严重并发症与死亡。两组患者术后肿瘤局部种植率与肿瘤转移率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜下结肠癌根治术有助于显著缩短病程,明显降低并发症发生风险,促进疾病的早期恢复,且不增加肿瘤局部种植与转移风险,具有良好的安全性与有效性。 Objective To study the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic radical colectomy for colon cancer. Method A retrospective analysis was conducted on the difference of clinical indexes, complication rates, and tumor metastasis rate between traditional open colectomy patients(control group, 56 cases) from January 2011 to January 2012 and radical laparoscopic colectomy patients from January 2013 to January 2014(observation group, 56 cases). Results The length of surgery and hospitalization, time interval between surgery and intestinal exhaust, first postoperative feeding, analgesia of the observation group were significantly shorter than that of the control group. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the observation group, and the average number of biopsy lymph nodes was significantly larger than in the observation group(P〈0.05). Incidence rate of postoperative complications was statistically lower in the observation group(P〈0.05), and there were no serious complications including postoperative hemorrhea, anastomotic fistula, fecal incontinence, urination dysfunction and death in the observation group. The postoperative local tumor implantation rate and tumor metastasis rate was not statistically different between the two groups(P〉0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic radical colectomy for colon cancer helped to shorten disease course and reduce the risk of complications significantly, and to promote early recovery of the diseases without increasing the risk of postoperative local tumor implantation and tumor metastasis. It was proved to have good safety and effectiveness in the study.
出处 《医院管理论坛》 2017年第4期28-32,共5页 Hospital Management Forum
关键词 腹腔镜 结肠癌 根治术 安全 Laparoscopi Colon cancer Radical colectomy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献87

  • 1Aikaterini Tsouma,Chrysanthi Aggeli,Panagiotis Lembessis,George N Zografos,Dimitris P Korkolis,Dimitrios Pectasides,Maria Skondra,Nikolaos Pissimissis,Anastasia Tzonou,Michael Koutsilieris.Multiplex RT-PCR-based detections of CEA, CK20 and EGFR in colorectal cancer patients[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(47):5965-5974. 被引量:19
  • 2曹金鹏,彭翔,胡丽娟,邓建中,周永辉,程龙庆,杨平,李志澄.75岁以上老年患者腹腔镜结直肠癌手术安全性的研究[J].消化肿瘤杂志(电子版),2011,3(2):82-85. 被引量:4
  • 3付斌,赵宏.二氧化碳气腹对直肠恶性肿瘤生长和转移的影响[J].中华实验外科杂志,2005,22(8):1021-1021. 被引量:17
  • 4牟一平,杨鹏,严加费,陈其龙,袁晓明,朱玲华,徐晓武.腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床疗效评估[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(9):581-583. 被引量:83
  • 5郑民华,马君俊.腹腔镜外科在争议中发展[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2007,14(5):503-505. 被引量:51
  • 6Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open sur- gery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis [ J . Ann Surg Oncol, 2006; 13(3) :413-24.
  • 7Mirza MS, Longman RJ, Farrokhyar F, et al. Long-term outcomes for lapa- roscopic versus open resection of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer [ J 1- J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2008 ; 18 (5) :679-85.
  • 8Champauh GG, Bah'at C, Raselli R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open su rgery for colorectal carcinoma: a prospective clinical trial involving 157 cases with a mean follow-up of 5 years[J. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percu- tan Tech ,2002 ; 12:88-95.
  • 9Kockerling F, Sebeidbach H, Schnciider G, et al. Laparoscopic abdomin operineal resection:early postoperative results of a prospective study in- volving 116 patients. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group J. Dis Colon Rectum,2000 ;43 : 1503-11.
  • 10Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S,et al. Laparoscopy-assis- ted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic co- lon cancer: a randomized trial[ J. Lancet,2001 ;359(9325 ) :2224-9.

同被引文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部