摘要
目的通过某综合医院前期构建的科研绩效评价指标体系,对某大型综合医院的两个基础科室在“十二五”期间的科研绩效情况进行测评,了解该科研评价指标体系实际应用性,了解指标体系评分与科室实际科研情况的对比情况,提出意见和建议。方法以构建的科研管理信息平台数据库为基础,采集医院两个基础科室近五年相关科研数据。通过医院已构建的科研绩效评价指标体系及权重,对一级、二级指标总分情况及具体三级指标进行统计和评价,利用SPSS软件进行统计分析。结果该指标体系基本上可以反映科室总体科研投入和产出情况,但一些具体指标不能真正反映出指标重要性,且指标之间权重差异较小,需对其进行论证性修订。结论医院应对该指标体系进行科学地完善,使指标的设定符合医院的发展方向,并将其与科研激励相结合,树立科研绩效评价管理理念,以保证医院科研发展的需要。
Objective Implementing the scientific research performance evaluation indicator sys- tem constructed to evaluate the situation of scientific research performance conducted by two basic Departments during the "12th Five-Year" period in a general hospital. To understand the practical appli- cability of the scientific evaluation index system, and also propose comments and suggestions based on the comparison between assessment score and actual research situation in the departments. Methods Based on the database of scientific research management information platform, collect related research data from two basic departments of the hospital in latest five years. Using SPSS software to conduct statistical analysis on the total score of the first and two indicators, as well as the specific indicators of the three indicators, according to the performance evaluation index system and the weight built by the hospital. Results The index system can basically reflect the general information of scientific research input and output in the department, however, some indicators cannot truly reflect the index impor- tance and the differences between the index weight is not significant, so it is necessary to make amend- ment based on demonstration. Conclusions Hospital should dynamically" update the index system to make them match the developing strategy of the hospital, also important to combine them with research stimulation to guarantee more scientific management and better service to the research develop- ment of hospitals.
出处
《中华医学科研管理杂志》
2017年第2期107-110,共4页
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
基金
北京医院院级课题(BJ-2012-134)
关键词
综合医院
科研绩效评价
指标体系
实践
General hospital~ Research performance evaluation~ Index system~ Practice