期刊文献+

有占位效应的重型颅脑损伤术后再次手术去骨瓣减压41例分析 被引量:7

41 cases of re-operation using decompressive craniectomy after craniotomy in patients with traumatic mass lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的总结重型颅脑损伤患者因占位性损伤术后再次手术去骨瓣减压的治疗经验。方法回顾性调查2008年1月~2014年10月在四川大学华西医院住院的重型颅脑损伤患者病历,筛查第一次手术清除脑挫裂伤或硬膜下血肿等占位性损伤术后保留骨瓣但再次手术去骨瓣减压的患者,分析再次手术去骨瓣减压原因。结果 41例术后再次手术去骨瓣减压,其中术后局部脑水肿和进展性出血34例,术区新发血肿6例,远隔部位血肿1例。结论有占位效应的重型颅脑损伤患者术后有14.4%的患者再次手术去骨瓣减压,对大多数没有术中脑膨出的患者保留骨瓣是安全的,但对于硬膜下血肿伴脑挫裂伤、伤后早期低血压和初始颅内压>35mm Hg的患者可能需要去骨瓣减压。 Objective To analyze the experience of re-operation using decompressive craniectomy(DC) to treat the patients with severe traumatic brain injury(sTBI) for mass lesions. Methods From Jan. 2008 to Oct.2014,the s TBI patients who underwent craniotomy for mass lesion evacuation in West China Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The initial demographic and radiographic features were analyzed to identify risk factors of secondary DC requirement. Results There were 41 patients who underwent re-operation using DC,including 34 cases of regional edema and progressive traumatic hematoma,6 cases of focal neonatal hematoma and 1 case of remote site hematoma. Conclusion The incidence of re-operation using DC after craniotomy was 14. 4%. For most mass lesions patients without malignant brain swelling,craniotomy is an acceptable surgical method in primary intervention.For patients with subdural hematoma associated contusion,early hypotension and higher initial intracranial pressure(> 35 mm Hg),DC may be required.
出处 《创伤外科杂志》 2017年第5期379-381,共3页 Journal of Traumatic Surgery
关键词 颅脑损伤 去骨瓣减压 再次手术 颅内压 traumatic brain injury decompressive craniectomy re-operation intracranial pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1Alexander E Jr. Management of severe traumatic brain in- jury by decompressive craniectomy. Neurosurgery 2001;48(3): 704.
  • 2Britt RH, Hamilton RD. Large decompressive craniotomy in the treatment of acute subdural haematoma. Neurosurgery 1978; 2(3): 195-200.
  • 3Howard JL, Cipolle MD, Anderson M, et al. Outcome after decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2008;65(2):380-5.
  • 4Jagannathan J, Okonkwo DO, Dumont AS, et al. Outcome following decompressive craniectomy in children with severe trau- matic brain injury: a 10-year single-center experience with long- term follow up. J Neurosurg 2007; 106(4 suppl):268-75.
  • 5Jiang JY, Xu W, Li WP, et al. Efficacy of standard trauma craniectomy for refractory intracranial hypertension with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study. J Neurotrauma 2005;22(6):623-8.
  • 6Munch E, Horn P, Schurer L, et al. Management of severe traumatic brain injury by decompressive craniectomy. Neurosur- gery 2000;47(2):315-22.
  • 7Williams RF, Magnotti L J, Croce MA, et al. Impact of decompressive craniectomy on functional outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2009;66(6): 1570-6.
  • 8Arac A, Blanchard V, Lee M, et al. Assessment of outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cere- bral artery infarction in patients older than 60 years of age. Neurosurg Focus 2009;26(6):E3.
  • 9Stiver SI. Complications of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Focus 2009;26(6):E7.
  • 10Gooch MR, Gin GE, Kenning TJ, et al. Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases. Neurosurg Focus 2009;26(6):E9.

共引文献8

同被引文献94

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部