有限责任公司股权代持的司法实践考察——对2011年来高院判决书的整理与研究

Investigation on the Judicial Practice of Limited Liability Company——A Study of the High Court Judgment in 2011

2011年发布的《公司法解释(三)》首次明晰股权代持法律关系中的有关权利义务,其实施效果饱受关注。通过整理分析73份自2011年以来经最高院、各地高院审理的股权代持相关判决书,发现法院对相关股东资格确认和股权确认纠纷已形成一定的裁判"公式",即"有效的股权代持协议/事实+实际出资+其他股东半数以上同意=可以显名",其中任一因素均有可能成为纠纷所在。考察司法实践中出现的各式具体争议,梳理研究法院的判决思路,可为学界讨论、业务操作提供些许参考。

In 2011, the interpretation of the company law （three） was the first time to clarify the rights and obligations of the legal relationship of the equity holders. Through the analysis of 73 copies since 2011 by the Supreme Court and the high court hearing on behalf of equity holders around the relevant judgment, the court found that the relevant shareholder qualification confirmation and equity dispute has formed a ＂formula＂,namely ＂the effective equity nominee agreement / fact ＋ actual investment more than half of the other shareholders agree = ＋ you can manifest＂, either of these factors are likely to become the dispute. Investigation of judicial practice in the emergence of a variety of specific disputes, the study of the court＇s decision to sort out ideas for academic discussion, business operations to provide some reference.