期刊文献+

会阴评估工具对ICU失禁患者失禁性皮炎发生的预警作用及相关危险因素分析 被引量:41

The analysis of predictive value and related risk factors for perineal assessment tool on incontinent-associated dermatitis among ICU incontinent patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨会阴评估工具对ICU失禁患者失禁性皮炎的预警作用及诊断界值。方法选取ICU失禁患者130例为研究对象,记录分析130例失禁患者的失禁风险评估及临床资料,使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积评价会阴评估工具的预测性能和最佳诊断界值。结果 130例患者中,发生失禁性皮炎48例,占36.92%。危险因素分析结果表明,大便性状、失禁评分为失禁性皮炎的危险因素,红细胞计数为失禁性皮炎的保护因素。由ROC曲线可知,会阴评估工具曲线下面积为0.795(P<0.01),会阴评估工具评分为8分时,其灵敏度(0.646)、特异度(0.850)具有最好的平衡性。结论会阴评估工具在预测ICU失禁患者失禁性皮炎中具有较高的灵敏度和特异度,值得广泛应用。 Objective To explore the predictive and cut - off value of perineal assessment tool for incontinent - associated dermatitis among ICU incontinence patients. Methods Picked up 130 cases from ICU as research objectors,recorded and analyzed the incontinence risk assessment and clinic document. All data of perineal assessment tool scores and clinical data were conducted. Predictive validity and out - off value of perineal assessment tool were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results Analysis of risk factors of lAD based on perineal assessment tool showed that type of stool and scores of perineal assessment tool were the risk factors, while red blood count was the protective factor for incontinence patients. ROC indicated that the area under curve was 0. 795 (P 〈 0.01 ). When cut - off value of perineal assessment tool scores reached 8,the sensitivity (0. 646) and specificity (0. 850) reached the best balance. Conclusion Perineal assessment tool has high sensitivity and specificity in predicting IAD for incontinence patients among ICU and should be widely used.
出处 《护理管理杂志》 2017年第4期232-234,共3页 Journal of Nursing Administration
关键词 ICU 失禁患者 失禁性皮炎 会阴评估工具 预警作用 危险因素 ICU incontinence patients incontinent - associated dermatitis perineal assessment tool forewarning function risk factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献69

  • 1张燕红,杨惠敏,郑宪萍.精神病患者暴力行为研究现状[J].中国护理管理,2007,7(3):29-30. 被引量:14
  • 2蔄茂强,辛淑君,Peter M Elias.皮肤表面pH值及其临床意义[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2007,21(8):503-505. 被引量:47
  • 3世界卫生组织 范肖东 汪向东 于欣 等译.ICD-10精神与行为障碍分类[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1993.38-57.
  • 4周晓华.诊断医学统计学[M].宋清华,译.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:139.
  • 5Bergstrom N, Braden BJ, Boynton P. Using a research - based assess- ment scale in clinical practice[ J ]. Nurs Clin North Am, 1995,30 (3) : 539 -551.
  • 6Langemo D, Baranoski S. Key points on caring for pressure ulcers in home care [ J 1. Home Healthc Nurs,2003,21 (5) : 309 - 315.
  • 7Schoonhoven L, Haalboom JR, Bousema MT. Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers[ J ]. BMJ,2002,325 ( 7368 ) :797.
  • 8Bergstrom N, Braden BJ. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale among Black and White subjects[J]. Nurs Res,2002,51 (6) :398 -403.
  • 9Daria LK. Reliability and Validity of the Braden Scale for predicting pressure ulcer risk [ J ]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nuts, 2007, 34(4) :368 -381.
  • 10Bergstrom N, Demuth PJ, Braden BJ. A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk J 1- Nurs Clin North Am, 1987, 22(2) :417 -428.

共引文献95

同被引文献349

引证文献41

二级引证文献154

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部