期刊文献+

运用Seminar教学法提高高职护生评判性思维能力的实践与效果分析 被引量:9

The practice and effect of Seminar teaching method in enhancing critical thinking among nursing students in higher vocational college
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价运用Seminar教学法在培养高职护生评判性思维能力中的应用效果。方法选取102名高职护生为对照组,100名高职护生为实验组,对照组采用传统教学法,实验组采用Seminar教学法,包括组建教学师资、制订教学计划、设置教学内容及实施教学方案。教学结束后,比较两组高职护生理论、操作考核成绩及评判性思维能力。结果两组高职护生理论、操作考核成绩比较,实验组高于对照组(P<0.01);实验组高职护生在评判性思维中,寻找真相,开放思想,系统化能力、自信心、求知欲维度得分均高于对照组(P<0.01或P<0.05)。结论 Seminar教学法对高职护生的综合能力具有积极影响,值得在护理高等教育中进一步推广。 Objective To evaluate the effect of Seminar teaching method in enhancing critical thinking among nursing students in higher vocational college. Methods A total of 102 nursing students in higher vocational college were selected as the control group, and 100 nursing students in higher vocational college as the intervention group. The control group received the traditional teaching method, while the intervention group received the Seminar teaching method. The theory and operating scores and critical thinking ability at the end of teaching were compared. Results The intervention group had higher scores in theory and operating than the control group( P 〈 0.01 ). The score of search for truth, open mindedness, systematization, self- confidence, curiosity in critical thinking ability in the intervention group were higher significantly than those of the control group ( P 〈 0. 01 or P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Seminar method has a positive effect on comprehensive ability among nursing students in higher vocational college ,which is worthy of further promotion in nursing education.
出处 《护理管理杂志》 2017年第4期266-267,共2页 Journal of Nursing Administration
基金 江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2015SJB614)
关键词 SEMINAR教学法 高职护生 评判性思维 综合能力 Seminar teaching method higher vocational nursing students critical thinking comprehensive abilities
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献36

  • 1彭美慈,汪国成,陈基乐,陈满辉,白洪海,李守国,李继平,蔡芸芳,王君俏,殷磊.批判性思维能力测量表的信效度测试研究[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(9):644-647. 被引量:1778
  • 2郑彩娥,林伟,叶洪青.我国康复护理的现状与发展思路[J].中国康复医学杂志,2006,21(3):266-269. 被引量:35
  • 3冯琳佩.略论基于社会互动理论的Seminar教学模式对研究生教育质量的影响[J].成都教育学院学报,2006,20(4):45-47. 被引量:23
  • 4Facione PA, Facione NC, Giancario CAF. The California critical thinking disposition inventory, CCTDI scoring supplement. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press, 2000.
  • 5Facione PA, Facione NC. The California critical thinking disposition inventory (CCTDI). Test administration manual. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press, 1992.
  • 6Ip WY, Lee DTF, Lee IFK, et al. Disposition towards critical thinking: a study of Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000, 32(1):84-90.
  • 7Yeh ML. Assessing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the california critical thinking disposition inventory. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2002, 39(2):123-132.
  • 8Albert RT, Albert RE, Radsma J. Relationships among bilingualism, critical thinking ability, and critical thinking disposition. Journal of Professional Nursing, 2002, 18(4):220-229.
  • 9Chan S. The Chinese learner - a question of style. Education and Training, 1999, 41(6/7):294-304.
  • 10Gao G. ''Don't take my word for it.''- understanding Chinese speaking practices. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1998, 22(2):163-186.

共引文献1830

同被引文献77

引证文献9

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部