期刊文献+

基于扎根理论的管理者应急决策模式构建研究 被引量:6

The Establishment of Emergency Decision-making Model for Managers based on the Grounded Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于扎根理论,通过访谈获取应急管理者在处理突发事件时的核心经验,归纳总结管理者的应急决策模式。被试系从事应急决策工作十年以上、具有丰富经验的管理者,利用录音设备收集其应急决策经验,转录为逐字稿,并使用QSR Nvivo 8.0软件进行处理和分析。研究结果如下:管理者的应急决策过程包含信息获取、问题界定与目标确定、方案设计与选择以及实施四个阶段;影响应急决策的主要因素包含管理者的价值观、经验、情绪、意志力及沟通协调。以上两部分组成了管理者的应急决策模式。 The grounded theory is used to guide collecting experience of emergency managers through interviews inorder to obtain a complete emergency decision - making model. The subjects are the experienced people who have led or taken part in emergency management for more than 10 years, and the recording devices are used to collect their emergency decision - making experience, and QSR Nvivo 8.0 software is applied to process and analyze the transcript. The main results are as follows, emergency decision -making process in- cludes four stages: information acquisition, problem definition & goal setting, project design & selection, and implementation. The main factors influence the emergency decision include the values, experience, emotion, will power and communication of the managers. These two parts form the model of managers' emergency deci- sion - making.
出处 《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第3期113-118,共6页 Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(13BGL074)
关键词 突发事件 应急决策模式 扎根理论 质性研究 emergencies emergency decision - making model grounded theory qualitative research
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献30

  • 1罗园园,许百华.认知性警戒作业绩效与刺激率、记忆负荷的关系[J].人类工效学,2006,12(1):49-50. 被引量:6
  • 2吴俊.突发公共事件社会应急机制的构成框架[J].统计与决策,2006,22(13):54-57. 被引量:32
  • 3Seeger, M.W., Sellnow, T.L., Ulmer, R.R. Communication, Organization, and Crisis. Communication Yearbook, 1998, 21: 231-275.
  • 4Schneider, W. & Shiffren, R.M. Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: I. Detection, Search, and Atten- tion. Psychological Review, 1977, 84: 1-66.
  • 5阿尔多·拉切奇尼,保罗·格林切尔等著.《神经无经济学:实证与挑战》,汪丁丁,叶航,罗卫东译,上海世纪出版集团,2007年,第59-60页.
  • 6Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D. Neuroeconomics: How Neumscience can Inform Economics. Journal of Economics Literature, 2005, XLIII (March): 9-64.
  • 7Epstein, S. & Pacini, 1 Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: The Guilford Press. 1999.
  • 8Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V. et al. Individual Differences in Intuitive-Experiential and Analytical-Rational Thinking Styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71: 390-405.
  • 9Wolford, G., Miller, M.B., Gazzaniga, M. The Left Hemi-sphere's Role in Hypotheses Formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 2000, 20 (6): 1-4.
  • 10Klein, G.A. Recognition-Primed Decisions. In W. Rouse (Ed.). Advances in Man Machine Systems Research. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc., 1989, 5 (4): 47-92.

共引文献96

同被引文献105

引证文献6

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部