期刊文献+

自我控制对2型糖尿病患者自我损耗的影响 被引量:13

Effect of self-control on the ego depletion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探索2型糖尿病(type2diabetesmellitus,T2DM)患者的自我控制对自我损耗的影响。方法采用自我损耗双任务范式进行研究。本研究为2×2组间设计,将确诊的T2DM患者设为研究组(n=30);另外选取健康志愿者设为正常对照组(nm30)。然后采用抽签法将每组完全随机分配到有损耗组和无损耗组,每组各30例。有损耗组完成经典Stroop任务;无损耗组完成一致性Stroop任务,然后用Simon任务考察两组研究对象的自我损耗效应。结果T2DM组在协同条件[(8.73±6.09)个,(5.10±4.35)个,E(1,58)=7.125,P=0.010]和非协同条件[(10.60±10.10)个,(3.97±3.97)个,E(1,58)=10.890,P=0.002]中的反应错误次数均高于正常对照组,差异有统计学意义;T2DM组在协同条件[(673.33±83.54)ms,(663.18±123.27)ms,F(1,58)=0.139,P=0.711]和非协同条件[(691.83±107.75)ms,(644.07±106.69)ms,F(1,58)=2.964,P=0.091]中的反应时长均高于正常对照组,差异无统计学意义。损耗组在协同条件[F(1,58)=0.821,P=0.369]和非协同条件[F(1,58)=0.231,P=0.632]中的反应错误次数均高于无损耗组,差异无统计学意义;损耗组在协同条件[F(1,58)=1.623,P=0.208]和非协同条件[F(1,58)=0.806,P=0.373]中的应时长均高于无损耗组,差异无统计学意义;被试类型与试验条件的交互作用不显著。结论T2DM患者处于慢性损耗状态,自我控制会增加自我损耗,使其自控能力下降,导致管理有一定困难。 Objective To explore the effect of self-control deficit on ego depletion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on the basis of ego-depletion theory. Methods Dual-Task Paradigms were used to manipulate self-control depletlon.This study employed 2~2 between-study design.T2DM patients were chosen as the study group, and healthy volunteers were selected as normal control group, with 30 cases in each group.They were randomly assigned to depleted group (30 cases ) or non-depleted group (30 cases ). Depleted group completed classical Stroop task, whereas, non-depleted group completed conformant Stroop task.Finally, the ego-depletion effects were investigated by Simon Task. Results The number of reaction errors in the T2DM group was significantly greater than that in the normal group under the compatible condition ( (8.73±6.09) vs ( 5.10±4.35 ), F(1,58) = 7.125, P= 0.010), and the incompatible condition( ( 10.60± 10.10) vs (3.97+3.97), F(1,58)= 10.890, P=0.002).The reaction time in the T2DM group was longer than that in the normal group under the compatible condition ( ( 673.33 ± 83.54 ) ms vs ( 663.18 ±123.27 ) ms, F(1,58) = 0.139, P= 0.711 ) and the incompatible condition ( ( 691.83±107.75 ) ms vs ( 644.07 ± 106.69 ) ms, F(1,58) = 2.964, P= 0.091 ), however, the differences were not statistically significant.The number of reaction errors in the depleted group was more than that in the non-depleted group under the compatible condition (F(1,58) = 0.821, P= 0.369) ,and the incompatible condition( F(1,58) = 0.231, P= 0.632) ,but the difference was not statistically significant.The reaction time in the depleted group was longer than that in the non-depleted group under the compatible condition(F(1,58) = 1.623, P= 0.208 ), and the incompatible condition (F( 1,58) = 0.806, P = 0.373), the differences were not statistically significant.The interactions between participants type and experimental conditions were not significant. Conclusion The patients with T2DM are in a state of chronic depletion and self-control will potentially aggravate ego depletion, which leads to decline in self-control ability and difficulties in self-management.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第4期344-348,共5页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31400885) 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室经费资助项目(KLMH2014ZG12)
关键词 自我控制 自我损耗 自我控制资源 2型糖尿病 Self-control Ego depletion Self-control resources Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献197

  • 1段晓英,言炎,黄慧.少年犯自我控制及相关因素的探讨[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,26(S1):85-89. 被引量:8
  • 2魏玉玲.对糖尿病患者实施强化教育的效果评价与分析[J].中国健康教育,2005,21(1):53-55. 被引量:45
  • 3唐尧,孙峰,徐艳,缪小萍,王劲松.社区糖尿病自我管理项目实施效果的评价[J].实用临床医药杂志,2005,9(9):83-85. 被引量:25
  • 4屈智勇,邹泓,张秋凌.基于自我控制理论的青少年犯罪研究(综述)[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(10):650-652. 被引量:22
  • 5阮晓楠 傅东坡 傅华.浦东新区糖尿病自我管理健康教育项目实施效果评价.中国全科医学,2009,12(8):1400-1400.
  • 6International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes atlas [M].Fourth Edition. Brussels:International Diabetes Federation,2009:37.
  • 7中国2型糖尿病防治指南制订委员会.中国2型糖尿病防治指南[M].北京:中华医学会糖尿病学分会,2007:1-2.
  • 8The American Diabetes Association. National standards for diabetes self-management education programs: task force to revise the national standards [ J ]. Diabetes Educ, 1995,21:189-193.
  • 9Nodhturft V. Chronic disease self-management: improving health outcomes[J]. Nurs Clin North Am,2000,35:507-518.
  • 10Higgins DM, Liu T.Asthma self-management: do patient education programs always have an impact [J]. Arch Inter Med,1999,159: 2422-2428.

共引文献149

同被引文献123

引证文献13

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部