科研评价体系中学术论文评价实证分析

Empirical study on appraisal of the academic paper in scientific research evaluation system

针对当前科研评价体系中学术论文质量评价存在的问题,以计算机学科学术论文评价为实证,以某大学的科研评价标准体系与考核指标为案例,对学术论文评价的相关问题进行研究。研究认为,如何判断会议论文和SCI期刊论文在科研评价体系中的价值与定位,能否坚持正确导向是科研管理评价体系面临的主要问题;在计算机学科中,国际上大部分标志性成果都会发表在顶级会议上,但中国的科研评价体系仍以SCI期刊论文为主,中国学者参与国际计算机学会的权威会议及其发文量均较低;中国科研评价体系应重视顶级会议论文的重要性,平衡不同评价指标的权重,平衡不同学科领域之间的差异,提高会议论文认定的等级,发挥评价体系的导向作用,制定科学的评价指标,完善科研评价管理制度;某高校制定了分学科科研评价标准体系和差异化的考核指标,依据不同的专业领域拟定了同行专家评价认可的期刊与会议列表,规范了期刊文章和会议文章的量化指标来综合衡量学术论文的学术和文献价值,在学术科研国际化方面取得了显著成绩。

To solve the problem that there are certain limitations to the appraisal of the academic paper in scientific research evaluation system, this paper took the appraisal of academic papers concerned with computer science as example and chose one university＇s scientific research evaluation criteria and indicators for performance appraisal as case to study relevant issues of academic papers appraisal. The results show that the key point of determining the value and orientation of top conference papers and SCI journal papers lies in whether to insist on correct guidance in scientific management evaluation system. In computer science, most symbolic achievements are published on the papers of international top conferences while Chinese scientific research evaluation system still puts focus on SCI journal papers, which leads to the low participation and quality of Chinese scholars＇ published papers at international computer science conferences. It puts forward some suggestions, such as top conference papers should be stressed in Chinese scientific research evaluation system, the weight of different evaluation indicators should be balanced, the difference between different disciplines should be considered, quality evaluation grade of conference papers should be raised, the guidance role of evaluation system should be played, a new scientific evaluation indicators should be formulated, and the management system of scientific research evaluation should be improved. A university formulated a scientific research evaluation system which considered the difference of disciplines and specified different evaluation indicators. It also listed the journals and conferences for different disciplines, which are recognized by experts and professionals, and gave specification for quantitative indicators of journal papers and conference papers to comprehensively determine the academic and documentary values of academic papers, which made great achievements in the internationalization of academic research.