摘要
文本指出:第一,同意《亘先》第12号简那两个被李零读作"恒"的字应当隶作"亟止"和"亟心",并读作"极"。至于第1-9号简那六个被裘锡圭读作"极"的"亘"字,文本认为应当读作"恒"。由此,这篇竹书可直接称名为《恒先》;第二,"恒"概念包含"恒先"在内,后一概念是从前一概念分化出来的。学者多将这两个概念等同起来,甚至以"恒先"为此一概念的优先表达形式,这是不正确的;第三,竹书的"恒"有别于老子的"道"。在《恒先》中,"恒"只是表示宇宙生化的初始阶段,而"恒先"则推至其极,表示宇宙的端初,跟《淮南子》的"太始"约略相当;第四,"恒"与"天道"在竹书中对应的宇宙生成论的阶段不同。"恒"居于初始阶段,即虚无阶段;而"天道"则居于形下界,是用来描述天地万物生成变化之客观法则的概念;第五,在《恒先》中,"恒"是一个特定的概念,它与"极"并非互为表里的关系。"恒"为恒常义,包含着质朴、静止和虚无的特性,它仅表示宇宙生化的初始阶段;而"极"训"准则",是以"天道"为其内涵的。
Abstract: the essay states: the author agrees with Mr. Li Ling on "恒"(heng)being pronounced as "极"(ji) and with Mr. Qiu Xijia on "亘"being pronounced as "恒"(heng). Hence, this bamboo-chip book is directly named 《恒先》 (hengxian); the concept"恒" contains "恒先",the latter deriving from the former concept. Scholars identify the two concepts, even giving "恒先"priority expression for this concept irrationally; "恒先"in bamboo chip is different from doctrine in Laoism. In 《恒先》(constancy), “恒” merely means the initial stage of universe biochemistry while "恒先"refers to the beginning of universe, roughly equivalent of "太始"in《淮南子》;'恒"in the bamboo chip is different from stage of universe formation. "恒" (heng) is in initial stage, namely:nihility stage; while "天道" is used to describe the objective concept of change of everything in formation;in 《恒先》,“恒” is a specific and constant meaning, featuring plainness, stillness and nihility, which stands for the initial phase of universe formation.
出处
《新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期40-49,共10页
Journal of Xinjiang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"出土简帛四古本<老子>综合研究"(15ZDB006)的成果
武汉大学自主科研项目"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"的资助
关键词
楚竹书
亘
亘先
恒先
极
天道
道
Bamboo-Chip Book of Chu State
亘(Heng)
亘先(Hengxian)
恒先(Hengxian)
极(Ji)
天道(Natural Rule)
道(Doctrine)