期刊文献+

证人、鉴定人出庭作证费用补偿制度比较研究 被引量:3

Cost for Witnesses or Appraisers to Testify in Civil Action
下载PDF
导出
摘要 证人、鉴定人出庭作证费用本质上属于证人、鉴定人履行出庭作证义务的对价,应由受诉法院向证人、鉴定人给付,且最终作为诉讼费用的一部分由当事人负担。证人、鉴定人出庭作证费用的补偿范围和补偿标准也应由立法作出统一、明确的规定,这不仅是科学构建证人、鉴定人出庭作证费用补偿制度之应有要义,也是大陆法系主要国家或地区的立法通例。我国现行相关规范不仅未厘清证人、鉴定人出庭作证费用的性质,也未能合理界定其补偿方式和具体路径,更存在证人出庭作证费用补偿范围不明确、补偿标准不统一以及鉴定人出庭作证费用补偿制度立法缺失等问题,导致民事司法实践中证人、鉴定人补偿制度适用失范。 The cost of the witnesses or appraisers appearing in court is to make up for the necessary expenses which disburse in the process of witnesses or appraisers appearing in court to exercise the jurisdiction of public law obligation to the court. Essentially, the cost is the necessary consideration for the performance of the obligation to testify in court, which should be paid by the court on behalf of the state to witnesses or appraisers and finally as a part of litigation fee shall be borne by the party. The range and standard of compensation for witnesses or appraiser' s legislation should be unified and clarified by the legislation. This is not only the point of scientific construction of the compensation system of the cost for witnesses or appraisers to testify in civil action, but also the general rule in the main civil law countries or regions. Our country' s existing relevant legislative norms not only failed to clarify the nature of the cost of the witnesses or appraisers appearing in court but also failed to reasonably define the corresponding compensation methods and specific paths, there is uncertainty in the scope of compensation, disunion of the compensation standards for witness testimony costs, and a lack of the appraiser' s testimony costs on legislation. All of those imperfections cause applicable anomie of the compensation system for witnesses or appraisers in civil judicial practice.
作者 占善刚 施瑶
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《河南财经政法大学学报》 2017年第3期156-166,共11页 Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金 2013年教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"证人 鉴定人出庭作证费用补偿制度研究"阶段性成果(项目编号:13YJA820063)
关键词 证人 鉴定人 出庭作证费用 补偿制度 witnesses appraisers cost for testifying in court compensation system
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献38

  • 1《民事诉讼法》第78条
  • 2[日]林屋礼二等.《民事诉讼法入门》,有斐阁1999年版,第127页.
  • 3Baur/Grunsky, Zivilproze? recht, s. 162, 10Aufl, 2000.
  • 4陈计男.《民事诉讼法论》[M].台湾三民书局,2002年8月版.第427页.
  • 5王甲乙 杨建华 郑健才.《民事诉讼法新论》[M].三民书局,2002年版.第398,260页.
  • 6[德]狄特·克罗林庚.《德国民事诉讼法律与实务》,刘汉富译,法律出版社,2000年版,第410-411页.
  • 7姚瑞光.《民事诉讼法论》,大中国图书公司,1981年版,第27页.
  • 8曹伟修.《民事诉讼法释论》,台湾金山图书公司1978年版,第293页
  • 9[日]小室直人,等.《新民事诉讼法》(Ⅱ),日本评论社2003年版,第226页.
  • 10[日]伊藤真.《实验对象讲座民事诉讼法》,弘文堂2005年版.

共引文献18

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部