期刊文献+

血液灌流联合序贯透析对终末期糖尿病肾病患者炎症介质及氧化应激的影响 被引量:14

Effect of blood perfusion combined with sequential dialysis on inflammatory mediators and oxidative stress of end-stage diabetic nephropathy patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨血液灌流联合序贯透析对终末期糖尿病肾病(end-stage diabetic nephropathy,ESDN)患者炎症介质与氧化应激的影响。方法:选取2014年2月至2015年2月来本院进行治疗的180例ESDN患者,按照随机数字表将其分为血液透析(hemodialysis,HD)组、序贯透析(sequential dialysis,SD)组和序贯透析联合血液灌流(sequential dialysis combined with hemoperfusion,S-HFP)组,每组60例。考察治疗前后3组患者的糖代谢指标、体内炎症反应水平,评价治疗前后患者体内氧化应激状态,比较透析充分性和贫血情况。结果:3组患者的空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖和糖化血红蛋白在治疗前后差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后S-HFP组患者的3项炎症因子指标显著低于其余两组(P<0.05),同时S-HFP组和SD组患者的3项炎症因子指标较治疗前显著降低(P<0.05),而HD组治疗前后炎症因子指标无变化(P>0.05)。治疗后SD组和S-HFP组患者的丙二醛(malondialdehyde,MDA)水平显著低于治疗前水平(P<0.05),而同时过氧化物歧化酶(superoxide dismutase,SOD)和谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(glutathione peroxidase,GSH-Px)水平显著升高(P<0.05);HD组患者的MDA水平较治疗前显著上升(P<0.05),而SOD和GSH-Px水平显著下降(P<0.05)。3组患者在治疗前体内尿素清除指数(urea clearance index,KT/V)水平差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但治疗后S-HFP组患者体内Hb水平显著提高(P<0.05)。结论:对终末期糖尿病肾病患者行序贯透析联合血液灌流,可以有效滤除炎症因子,缓解患者体内氧化应激反应,改善患者贫血状况,效果显著,值得临床推广。 Objective: To investigate the effect of blood perfusion combined with sequential dialysis on inflammatory mediators and oxidative stress of end- stage diabetic nephropathy patients. Methods: 180 patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy coming to our hospital from February 2014 to February 2015 were randomly divided into three groups , namely hemodialysis group (HD), sequential dialysis (SD) group and sequential dialysis combined with hemoperfusion(S-HFP) group, 60 cases in each group. Patients in HD group underwent conventional dialysis, while patients in SD group underwent sequential hemodiafiltration, where as patients in S-HFP group underwent sequential hemodiafiltration combined with bemoperfusion. The indexes of glucose metabolism and the levels of inflammatory response in vivo were investigated before and after the treatment. And the oxidative stress state was evaluated. Dialysis adequacy and anemia were compared. Results: Three groups of patients showed no significant difference on FBG, P2hBG and HbA1 c levels before and after the treatment (P 〉 0.05 ). After the treatment three indexes of inflammatory factor in S- HFP group were significantly lower than those of the other two groups (P 〈 0.05 ). At the same time, three indexes of inflammatory factor in S-HFP group and SD group significantly decreased compared with those before the treatment ( P 〈 O. 05 ). However there were no significant differences in inflammatory factors in HD group before and after the treatment ( P 〉 O. 05 ). After the treatment, the MDA levels in patients of S- HDF group and S- HFP groups were significantly lower than those before the treatment ( P 〈 0.05 ), while the levels of SOD and GSH PX increased significantly ( P 〈 0.05 ). MDA levels in patients of HD group significantly increased after the treatment compared with those before the treatment ( P 〈 0.05 ). However the level of SOD and GSH PX decreased significantly ( P 〈 0.05 ). There were no significant differences in KT/V levels between the three groups before and after the treatment (P 〉 0.05 ). But the level of Hbof patients in S- HFP group was significantly increased after the treatment ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion: For patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy, undergoing sequential hemodialysis combined with hemoperfusioncan can effectively remove inflammatory factors, improve anemia status and alleviate oxidative stress. It is worthy of promotion.
作者 艾玲 AI Ling(General Hospital of Dongfeng Motor Corporation, Hubei Medical College, Shiyan 442000, Chin)
出处 《现代医学》 2017年第2期174-179,共6页 Modern Medical Journal
关键词 血液灌流 糖尿病肾病 炎症介质 氧化应激 hemoperfusion diabetic nephropathy inflammatory mediators oxidative stress
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献49

  • 1张伟明,钱家麒.上海市透析登记及其结果分析[J].中国血液净化,2012,11(5):233-236. 被引量:83
  • 2季大玺.终末期糖尿病肾病治疗现状[J].中国中西医结合肾病杂志,2004,5(11):621-623. 被引量:10
  • 3方咏梅,吴云霞,方梅红.血液透析中低血压的护理[J].中国医药导报,2007,4(06S):77-77. 被引量:26
  • 4牛兰英,毛海萍.血液透析急性并发症[M]//沈清瑞,叶任高,余学清.血液净化与肾移植.北京:人民卫生出版社,1998:81.
  • 5樊均明,李孜.血液净化的循证医学.血液净化理论与实践[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2008:36.
  • 6Flanigan M J, Khairullah QT, Lira VS. Dialysate sodium delivery can alter chronic blood pressure management [ J ]. Am J Kidney Dis, 1997,29 ( 3 ) :383-391.
  • 7Oliver M J, Edwards LJ, Churchill DN. Impact of sodium and uhrafihration profiling on hemodialysis- related symptoms [ J]. J Am Soc Nephrol,2001,12 ( 1 ) : 151-156.
  • 8刘锦铎.单纯超滤及序贯透析肾脏替代治疗学[M].上海:上海科学技术文献出版社,1999:187-188.
  • 9Odar-Cederlof I, Theodorsson E, Eriksson CG, et al. Vasoactive agents and blood pressure regulation in sequential ultrafiltration and hemodialysis [ J ]. Int J Artif Organs, 1993,16 ( 9 ) :662 -669.
  • 10Iselin H, Tsinalis D, Brunner FP. Sodium balance-neutral sodium profiling does not improve dialysis tolerance [ J ]. Swiss Med Wkly, 2001,131 (43-44) :635-639.

共引文献134

同被引文献118

引证文献14

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部