期刊文献+

探讨舒芬太尼联合地佐辛在上腹部手术后自控镇痛中的临床效果 被引量:3

Study on Clinical Effect of Sufentanil and Dezocine in the Patient-controlled Analgesia of Upper Abdominal Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨分析舒芬太尼联合地佐辛在上腹部手术后自控镇痛中的临床效果。方法方便选取该院自2015年1月—2016年12月这一段期间内收治的需行上腹部手术的患者122例作为临床研究对象,以随机对照分组法将其平均分成两组,一组作为观察组,一组作为对照组,各61例,两组均行气管插管全身麻醉,术中注射昂丹司琼,于手术结束前10 min时,对观察组采用舒芬太尼+地佐辛+昂丹司琼行自控静脉镇痛,对照组采用舒芬太尼+昂丹司琼行自控静脉镇痛,分别在术后2、6、12、24、48 h时观察比较两组患者的视觉模拟评分(VAS评分)、镇静评分、自控镇痛次数及不良反应发生率。结果术后2、6 h及术后12 h时两组患者的VAS评分均呈显著上升趋势(P<0.05);术后24 h和术后48 h时两组患者的VAS评分均呈显著下降趋势(P<0.05);术后2、6、12、24、48 h时观察组患者的VAS评分均显著低于对照组患者(P<0.05)。术后2、6、12 h及术后24 h时两组患者的镇静评分均呈显著上升趋势(P<0.05),术后48 h时两组患者的镇静评分均呈显著下降趋势(P<0.05);术后2、6、12、24、48 h时观察组患者的镇静评分均显著低于对照组患者(P<0.05)。术后2、6、12、24、48 h时两组患者的自控镇痛次数均呈显著下降趋势(P<0.05);术后2、6、12、24、48h时观察组患者的自控镇痛次数均显著少于对照组患者(P<0.05)。观察组患者的不良反应发生率(8.2%)显著低于对照组患者(39.3%)(P<0.05)。结论舒芬太尼联合地佐辛在上腹部手术后自控镇痛中应用不但镇痛效果显著,且安全性高,不良反应较少,可于临床上推广应用。 Objective To study the clinical effect of sufentanil and dezocine in the patient-controlled analgesia of upper abdominal surgery. Methods Convenient selection 122 cases of patients needing the upper abdominal surgery admitted and treated in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2016 were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 61 cases in each, both groups adopted the tracheal cannulation general anesthesia and were injected with ondansetron in operation, and the observation group adopted the sufentanil and dezocine and ondansetron for the patient-controlled analgesia,while the control group adopted the sufentanil and ondansetron for the patient-controlled analgesia, and the VAS score,calm score, patient-controlled analgesia and incidence rate of adverse reactions at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 h after operation of the two groups were observed. Results The VAS score showed an obvious increasing trend at 2, 6 h and 12 h after operation(P〈0.05), and the VAS score showed an obvious decreasing trend at 24 h and 48 h after operation(P〈0.05), and the VAS scores at 2, 6, 12, 24 h and 48 h after operation were obviously lower than those in the control group(P〈0.05), and the calm scores at 2, 6, 12, 24 h and 48 h after operation showed an obvious increasing trend(P〈0.05), and the calm score of the two groups at 48 h after operation showed an obvious decreasing trend(P〈0.05), and the calm scores at 2, 6, 12, 24 h and 48 h after operation were obviously lower than those in the control group(P〈0.05), and the patient-controlled analgesia time at 2, 6,12, 24 h and 48 h after operation showed an obvious increasing trend, and the patient-controlled analgesia times at 2, 6,12, 24 h and 48 h after operation in the observation group were obviously fewer than those in the control group(P〈0.05), and the incidence rate of adverse reactions in the observation group was obviously lower than that in the control group(8.2% vs39.3%)(P〈0.05). Conclusion The effect of sufentanil and dezocine in the Patient-controlled analgesia of upper abdominal surgery is obvious with high safety and few adverse reactions, which can be promoted and applied in clinic.
作者 屈新民
出处 《中外医疗》 2017年第10期134-136,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 舒芬太尼 地佐辛 上腹部手术 自控镇痛 Sufentanil Dezocine Upper abdominal surgery Patient-controlled analgesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献91

  • 1吕洁,董莹.地佐辛用于剖宫产术后镇痛的临床研究[J].医药前沿,2012,2(15):223-224.
  • 2文莉,陈蕙.地佐辛复合舒芬太尼用于胃肠道肿瘤术后镇痛的临床观察[J].健康必读杂志(下旬刊),2013,6(6):399.
  • 3周正阳.地佐辛联合舒芬太尼术后镇痛的效果观察[J].医学信息.2013,7(26):283-284.
  • 4马新军.地佐辛联合舒芬太尼用于术后静脉镇痛的效果观察[J].中外健康文摘,2013,10(27):235.
  • 5李世建,郭新玲,李佩宏,等.地佐辛复合舒芬太尼用于腔镜下妇科手术术后镇痛的疗效观察[J].中国保健营养(上旬刊),2013,23(6):3232-3233.
  • 6Chunying Wang, Lizhi Li, Boxiong Shen, et al. Amulticenter ran- domized double-blind prospective study of the postoperative pa- tient controlled intravenous analgesia effects of dezocine in elderly patients [J]. Int J Clin Exp Med ,2014,7(3):530-539.
  • 7Power L,McCormack J.Postoperative pain management:new,convenient analgesic therapies[J].Expert Opin Pharmacother,2007,8(4):391-399.
  • 8DiGiusto M,Bhalla T,Martin D, et al. Patient - controlled analgesia inthe pediatric population : morphine versus hydromorphone [ J ]. J PainRes, 2014,7:471 -475.
  • 9Devesa JM, Vicente R,Abraira V. Visual analogue scales for grad-ing faecal incontinence and quality of life : their relationship with theJorge - Wexner score and Rockwood scale [ J ] . Tech Coloproctol,2013,17:67 -71.
  • 10Hernandez - Gancedo C,Pestana D,Perez - Chrzanowska H,et al.Comparing Entropy and the Bispectral index with the Ramsay score insedated ICU patients [J] . J Clin Monit Comput, 2007 , 21 : 295 -302.

共引文献97

同被引文献29

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部