期刊文献+

正电子发射计算机体层成像-CT预测表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂对非小细胞肺癌疗效及预后的价值

Early predictive and prognostic value of 18^F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-CT for response assessment in non-small cell lung cancer treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨18氟-脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)PET-CT在早期预测表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI)对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗有效性及预后中的应用价值.方法 2009年8月至2015年4月行EGFR-TKI治疗的NSCLC患者22例,分别于治疗前及治疗1个月后行PET-CT检查,以18F-FDG摄取最高病灶作为靶病灶(总数不超过5个,每个器官不超过2个),分别测量治疗前后最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax),并计算SUVmax变化率(ΔSUV%),参照实体瘤治疗疗效PET评价标准(PERCIST)评估代谢改变.此后每2个月一次CT随访,以实体瘤疗效评价标准1.1版(RECIST 1.1)评价疗效.应用Kappa一致性检验分析基于PERCIST标准的PET-CT疗效评价与基于RECIST标准的疗效评价结果 的一致性.应用Fisher精确检验比较治疗早期代谢缓解组与无缓解组中出现疾病进展的概率.通过ROC曲线分析获得ΔSUV%预测治疗敏感或病变无进展的临界值和预测效能.应用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,采用log-rank检验比较组间无进展生存期差异.结果 EGFR-TKI治疗1个月后,12例患者代谢部分缓解(PMR),6例代谢稳定(SMD),4例代谢进展(PMD).治疗1个月后代谢评估结果 与治疗3个月后CT疗效评价结果 具有中等度的一致性(Kappa=0.506,P〈0.05);治疗早期表现为代谢缓解(PMR)的患者出现疾病进展的概率显著低于代谢无缓解者(χ^2=11.941,P=0.005);而治疗早期表现为代谢进展(PMD)的患者均出现了疾病进展;以ΔSUV%=40.36%为界值,预测治疗敏感的敏感度和特异度分别为88.9%和84.6%,曲线下面积为0.906(95%置信区间:0.766~1.000,P=0.002).以ΔSUV%=25.84%为界值对患者分组进行生存分析,组间PFS差异有统计学意义(P=0.026).结论 EGFR-TKI治疗1个月时行18F-FDG PET-CT检查可用于早期预测NSCLC治疗疗效及预后. Objective To evaluate whether an early change in 18^F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18^F-FDG) uptake can predict tumor response to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods From August 2009 to April 2015, 22 patients with NSCLC who were eligible to EGFR-TKI treatment were enrolled. PET-CT scan was performed before (baseline) and 1 month after EGFR-TKI administration. Up to 5 hottest single tumor lesions (no more than 2 per organ) were considered to be target lesions. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were measured, and post-treatment percentage changes in SUVmax (ΔSUV%) were calculated. PET responses were classified using PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST). Then conventional CT scan was performed every 2 months for follow-up. Kappa statistic was used to compare agreement between the RERCIST recommendations-based therapeutic response evaluation and those based on RECIST1.1 criteria. Fisher exact test was used to compare the probability of disease progression in the early metabolic response and non-response groups. Predictive accuracy of ΔSUV% with respect to response or non-progression at CT scan was evaluated by ROC analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) was determined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and between-group comparison was performed by log-rank test. Results After 1 month of EGFR-TKI treatment, 12 patients (55%) showed partial metabolic response (PMR), 6 (27%) had stable metabolic disease (SMD), and 4 (18%) had progressive metabolic disease (PMD). There was a moderate agreement(Kappa=0.506,P〈0.05) between PET response at 1 month based on PERCIST recommendations and CT response at 3 months according to RECIST 1.1. Non-progression was significantly more frequent in patients with an early PMR (χ2=11.941, P=0.005). Progression had been confirmed later during therapy in all patients with PMD . By using ROC analysis, the area under the curve for prediction of response was 0.906 (95% CI, 0.766—1.000; P=0.002), corresponding to a sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 84.6% at a cut-off of 40.36% in ΔSUV%. Using a cut-off value of 25.84% in ΔSUV%, highΔSUV% group (ΔSUV% ≥ 25.84%) had significantly longer PFS than low ΔSUV% group (ΔSUV%〈25.84%). Conclusion Early assessment of PET-CT at 1 month of EGFR-TKI treatment could be useful to predict tumor response and clinical outcome in patients with NSCLC.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第5期339-344,共6页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
基金 首都临床特色应用研究专项(Z131107002213015) 国家高技术研究发展计划(2014AA020602) 国家重大科学仪器设备开发专项(2011YQ17006710)志谢中国医学科学院肿瘤医院PET-CT中心技术员及护士对本课题的支持和帮助
关键词 非小细胞肺 正电子发射断层显像术 体层摄影术 X线计算机 分子靶向治疗 Carcinoma non-small cell lung Tomography X-ray computed Positron-emission tomography Molecular targeted therapy
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献38

  • 1Riely GJ, Politi KA, Miller VA, et al. Update on epidermal groxah factor receptor ntations in non-small cell lung cancer [ J ], Clin Cancer Res, 2006, 12(24):7232-7241.
  • 2Onitsuka T, Uramoto H, Nose N, et al. Acquired resistance to gefitinib: the contribution of mechanisms other than the T790M, MET, and HGF status[J]. Lung Cancer, 2010, 68(2) :198-203.
  • 3Su KY, Chen HY, Li KC, et al. Pretreatment epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation predicts shorter EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor response duration in patients with non- small-cell lung cancer [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30 ( 4 ) : 433 -440.
  • 4Shi Y, Au JS, Thongprasert S, et al. A prospective, molecular epidemiology study of EGFR mutations in Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology (PIONEER) [J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2014, 9(2):154-162.
  • 5Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M, et al. Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer[ J]. Nature, 2007, 448(7153) :561-566.
  • 6Zhang X, Zhang S, Yang X, et al. Fusion of EMLA and ALK is associated with development of lung adenocarcinomas lacking EGFR and KRAS mutations and is correlated with ALK expression [J]. Mol Cancer, 2010, 9:188.
  • 7Zhang NN, Liu YT, Ma L, et al. The molecular detection and clinical significance of ALK rearrangement in selected advanced non-small cell lung cancer: ALK expression provides insights into ALK targeted therapy[ J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9 ( 1 ) : e84501.
  • 8Sequist LV, Martins RG, Spigel D, et al. First-line gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring somatic EGFR mutations[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(15) :2442-2449.
  • 9Mitsudnmi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, et al. Gefitlnib versus eisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WYrOG5405): an open label, randnmised phase 5 trial [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11 (2) : 121-128.
  • 10Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation- positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802 ) : a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study[J]. Lancet Oneol, 2011, 12 ( 8 ) : 735-742.

共引文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部