结构实在论中的本体论

Ontology in Structural Realism

本体的结构实在论以结构主义方法论僭越形而上学,表现为本体论认识不明确。结构不取决于元素,这是错误的本体论命题。为了存在,不诉诸于个体,这是错误的认识论命题。建构的结构实在论提出"本体论综合",试图解决"悲观元归纳"问题。但是,对结构和实体谁为本体论模棱两可。为赋予数学结构以物理内容,结构变成衍生品。为应对不充分决定性命题,认识论上需令结构处于优先位置。理论术语是一个体系,并非某一术语单独构成本体论。科学发展过程中理论术语根据经验作适当增减。结构实在论没有处理好本体论与理论术语之间关系。结构实在论中形而上学与本体论有重叠,因果关系是其必须回答的话题。

Ontic structure realism （OSR） had substituted structuralist methodology for metaphysics which is overflowing to the unclear understanding of the ontology. It is wrong ontological proposition that structure doesnt depend on the elements. It is the wrong proposition of epistemology that relata was not resorted to the individuality only for primitive thisness. ＂ Ontology systhesis＂ which is offered a proposal by constructive structural realism （CSR） try to solve the problem of scientific theory of continuity. But, it is ambiguity to determinate whether structure or entity is ontology. To solve the problem of the experience of scientific theory, the structure is becoming a kind of derivatives. In response to the underdetermination argument, structure must be priori to the others in the epistemology. Theoretical terms is such system that single term makes up ontology. Theory terms will be appropriately increased or de- creased according to the experience in the development of science. Structural realism didnt handle with the relationship between the ontology and the theo- retical term. Ontology overlap metaphysics in the argument of structural realism, which causality is the topic to which structural realism will response.