期刊文献+

中文版肺癌患者病耻感量表的心理测量学评价 被引量:23

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale(CLCSS)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价Cataldo肺癌患者病耻感量表(CLCSS)中文版的心理测量学特征。方法采用方便抽样,在北京市某三级甲等医院及部分抗癌团体中抽取肺癌患者775例,并使用中文版CLCSS施测。结果内容效度中全体一致性S-CVI为0.87,均值S-CVI为0.96。探索性因子分析结果显示共有4个主成分,方差累计贡献率为55.248%。验证性因子分析结果显示所有指标均在适配标准范围内。重测信度系数ICC(组内相关系数)值为0.801(P<0.01)。总量表的Cronbach'sα系数为0.932,各因子Cronbach'sα系数为0.799~0.922。结论中文版CLCSS具有良好的信效度,可应用于肺癌患者。 Objective To evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of Cataldo Lung Can eer Stigma Scale (CLCSS). Methods Convenience sampling was used to recruit 775 lung cancer patients in a tertiary hospital and some anticancer groups in Beijing,and the Chinese version of CLCSS was used to perform measurement. Results The S-CVUUA was 0.87,and S-CVI/Ave was 0.96. Construct validity consisted of EFA and CFA. Through EFA,the Chinese version of CLCSS included four dimensions which accounted for 55.248% of the accumulated variance. Through CFA,all the indicators were in adaptation standard range. The test-retest reliability for the Chinese version of CLCSS was 0.801(P〈0.01). Cronhaeh's α coefficient was 0.932,and Cronbach's α eoeffi-cients for four dimensions ranged from 0.799 to 0.922. Conclusion The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CLCSS are satisfactory and the Chinese version of CLCSS can be used among Chinese lung cancer patients.
作者 于媛 王黎 张娜 杜艳华 白颖 刘均娥 YU Yuan WANG Li ZHANG Na DU Yan-hua BAI Ying LIU Jun-e
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第5期636-640,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
基金 协和青年基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(33320140112)
关键词 肺肿瘤 肺癌患者病耻感量表 评价研究 Lung Neoplasms Lung Cancer Stigma Scale Evaluation Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献53

  • 1徐晖,李峥.精神疾病患者病耻感的研究进展[J].中华护理杂志,2007,42(5):455-458. 被引量:82
  • 2Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 3Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 4Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 5Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 6Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 7Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 8Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 9Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.
  • 10Nora JJ.Causes old and new modes,mechanisms and models.Am Heart J,1993,125:1409

共引文献1136

同被引文献236

引证文献23

二级引证文献225

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部