期刊文献+

不对称信息下考虑供应中断和延期交货的采购合同设计 被引量:1

Procurement Contract Design Considering Supply Disruption and Delay in Delivery under Asymmetric Information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究不对称信息下供应商供应中断和延期交货两类风险对制造商采购决策的影响。运用采购机制设计理论与方法,分析了制造商最优采购合同及供应商最优生产决策。结果表明:1)供应商生产数量和交货提前期应分别用中断罚金和延期罚金规制;2)供应商有关供应可靠性的私有信息使高类型供应商的两类罚金均增加,交货提前期缩短;同时,低类型供应商的中断罚金减小,延期罚金和交货提前期不受影响;3)信息不对称不一定降低社会福利。 In order to explore the impact of supply disruption risk and delay m delivery on me manutactm^t ~ p^L,~,tu decisions under asymmetric information, the manufacturer's optimal procurement contracts and supplier's optimal production decisions are analyzed, by employing the theory and methodology of procurement mechanism design. The results show that: 1) the manufacturer should regulate the production quantity and lead time of the supplier by designing penalty for non-delivery and for delay in delivery, respectively. 2) Given supplier's private information about supply reliability, the high type supplier receives higher penalties for non-delivery and delay in delivery than in the case of symmetric information, shortening the optimal lead time. In contrast, the low type supplier obtains lower penalty for non- delivery, and the penalty for delay in delivery is not affected by information asymmetry, leading to unchanged lead time decision. 3) Information asymmetry does not necessarily decrease social welfare.
作者 申笑宇 宋炆倩 SHEN Xiaoyu SONG Wenqian(School of Economics and Management, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)
出处 《工业工程》 2017年第2期1-6,共6页 Industrial Engineering Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71471021) 重庆市教委科学技术研究资助项目(KJ1704084) 重庆市社会科学规划资助项目(2016BS030) 湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会资助项目(XSP17YBZC009)
关键词 供应风险 合同设计 信息不对称 延期罚金 中断罚金 supply risk contract design information asymmetry penalty for delay in delivery penalty for non-delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献38

  • 1鲁其辉,朱道立,林正华.带有快速反应策略供应链系统的补偿策略研究[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(4):14-23. 被引量:30
  • 2于辉,陈剑,于刚.协调供应链如何应对突发事件[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(7):9-16. 被引量:186
  • 3于辉,陈剑,于刚.回购契约下供应链对突发事件的协调应对[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(8):38-43. 被引量:166
  • 4Hatoum K.M.,Chang Y L.Trade-off between lead time and price[J].Porduction Planning & Control,1997,8(2):158-172.
  • 5Mendelson,H.,Whang,S.Optimal incentive compatible priority ricing for the M/M/1 queue[J].Operations Research,1990,38(5):870-883.
  • 6Stalk G Jr.Time-the next source of competitive advantage[J].Harvard Business Review,1988,66(4):41-51.
  • 7Marucheck A.S.,Mcclelland M.K.Strategic issues in make-in-order manufacturing [J].Production and Inventory Management,1996,2(4):23-95.
  • 8Moorthy,S.,and Srinivasan,K.Signaling quality with a money-back guarantee:The role of transaction costs[J].Marketing Science,1995,14(4:442-466.
  • 9Bhargara,H.,Sundaresan,S.Contingency pricing for information goods and services under industry wide performance standard[J].Journal of Management Information Systems,2003,20(2):113-136.
  • 10Lax D.A.,and Sebenius,J.K.The manager as negotiator:Bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain[M].1986,Free Press.

共引文献45

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部