论《民法总则》知识产权条款中的“专有”

On the “Exclusiveness” as Stipulated in the Intellectual Property Provision in the General Principles of Civil Law

《民法总则》第123条将知识产权定义为"专有的"权利,本意是彰显知识产权的特征,尤其是区分物权与知识产权。该立法表述既源自"专有性是知识产权的特征"这一理论通说,也源自对知识财产保护中专有权模式与制止不正当竞争模式二者关系的忽视。"专有性是知识产权的特征"在逻辑上无法证立。出于法教义学的目的,此条的"专有的"限定只能被解释为一种语言习惯,既不意味着在实质上肯定了专有性是知识产权的特点,也不意味着排除了制止不正当竞争保护。

Article 123 of the General Principles of Civil Law describes intellectual property as 〈6exclusive righf9, intending to express the feature of intellectual property right, especially compared with real right. Such expression originates the popular doctrine that exclusiveness is one particularity of intellectual property, and also due to the ignorance about distinction between exclusive right model and anti-unfair competition model for the protection of intellectual property. ^Exclusiveness is particularity of intellectual property,5 cannot be justified logically. In the seme of legal dogmatic, “exclusive right” herein should be interpreted just as a It cannot be understood thaf＇exclusiveness is particularity of intellectual property,,5 neither as the exclusion of anti-unfair competition.