摘要
作为一代文学宗师,海明威百余年来一直受到学术界的高度重视,对其创作思想和文学风格的学术研究热度经久不衰。综合国内外学术界对海明威研究的历程,人物形象塑造、文体创新和生态批评是海明威研究的三个主要视角。在这三个视角的研究中,中外学者基本上持先否定后肯定的批评态势。海明威批评发展史表明,文学批评同文学创作一样,经历了与时俱进的发展道路,而产生这种现象的根本原因在于文学价值具有时代性。鉴于此,海明威研究,无论是肯定性的,还是否定性的,结论正确与否都需要经过历史的检验。
As one of the great literary masters, Hemingway has been paid great attention by literary critical circle,and the critics have kept their enthusiasm to study his ideology and writing style. In the comprehensive study of Hemingway both at home and abroad, there are three main perspectives in this field, which are his image of code hero, innovation of writing style and eeocriticism. In the study with the three perspectives,almost all the scholars both at home and abroad have held the attitude toward Hemingway that they deny first and then conform. It has been shown in the history of Hemingway studies that as the same as literary creation,literary criticism of Hemingway has witnessed the developing experience of keeping pace with the times. The main reason of such circumstances lies in the historical sense of literature. Therefore,the conclusions of Hemingway criticism need historical examination whether the conclusions are affirmative or negative.
出处
《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期92-97,共6页
Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社科基金项目(15BWW021)