期刊文献+

高危型人乳头状瘤病毒病毒载量与宫颈癌临床病理因素关系的研究 被引量:9

Relationship between high-risk human papillomavirus viral load and clinical pathological factors of cervical cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 研究高危型人乳头状瘤病毒(HR-HPV)病毒载量与宫颈癌临床病理因素的关系.方法 选取初次治疗、经病理学检查诊断为宫颈癌患者97例,对HR-HPV病毒载量与宫颈癌临床病理因素的关系进行分析.结果 宫颈癌Ⅰ期患者(45例)HR-HPV病毒载量显著高于宫颈癌Ⅱ期(29例)、宫颈癌 ≥Ⅲ期(23例)患者[484.03(289.22,773.54)RLU/CO比88.24(53.15,133.30)和41.41(13.39,164.21)RLU/CO],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);宫颈癌Ⅱ期患者与宫颈癌≥Ⅲ期患者比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05).宫颈癌〈ⅡB期(48例)患者HR-HPV病毒载量明显高于宫颈癌≥ⅡB期患者(49例)[464.23(235.66,742.89)RLU/CO比61.87(22.85,138.82)RLU/CO],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).将患者按HR-HPV病毒载量分为〉100 RLU/CO组(57例)和≤100 RLU/CO组(40例),≤100 RLU/CO组宫颈癌≥ⅡB期比率明显高于〉100 RLU/CO组[75.0%(30/40)比33.3%(19/57)],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01).97例宫颈癌患者中,高分化9例、中分化58例、低分化19例、分化程度不清11例.去除分化程度不清患者,高中分化患者HR-HPV病毒载量明显高于低分化患者[173.56(62.76,523.92)RLU/CO比45.71(4.05,164.21)RLU/CO],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).结论 HR-HPV病毒载量随宫颈癌临床分期及病理分级的进展而降低,提示其在宫颈癌进展中的作用可能不显著,低HR-HPV病毒载量在≥ⅡB期的宫颈癌中常见,可能提示低病毒载量是宫颈癌患者预后不良的指标之一. Objective To study the relationship between high-risk human papillomavirus (HR- HPV) viral load and clinical pathological factors of cervical cancer. Methods Ninety- seven initial treatment patients with cervical cancer were selected, and they were diagnosed by pathological examination. The relationship was analyzed between HR-HPV viral load and clinical pathological factors of cervical cancer. Results The HR- HPV viral load in cervical cancer Ⅰ stage (45 cases) was significantly higher than that in cervical cancer Ⅱ stage (29 cases) and cervical cancer ≥Ⅲ stage (23 cases):484.03 (289.22, 773.54) RLU/CO vs. 88.24 (53.15, 133.30) and 41.41 (13.39, 164.21) RLU/CO, and there was statistical difference (P〈0.05); but there was no statistical difference between cervical cancerⅡstage and cervical cancer≥Ⅲstage (P〉0.05). The HR-HPV viral load in cervical cancer〈ⅡB stage (48 cases) was significantly higher than that in cervical cancer ≥ⅡB stage (49 cases): 464.23 (235.66, 742.89) RLU/CO vs. 61.87 (22.85, 138.82) RLU/CO, and there was statistical difference (P〈0.05). The patients were divided into 〉100 RLU/CO group (57 cases) and ≤100 RLU/CO group (40 cases) according to the HR- HPV viral load. The rate of cervical cancer ≥ⅡB stage in ≤100 RLU/CO group was significantly higher than that in〉100 RLU/CO group:75.0%(30/40) vs. 33.3%(19/57), and there was statistical difference (P〈0.01). Among 97 patients with cervical cancer, well-differentiated was in 9 cases, moderately differentiated in 58 cases, poorly differentiated in 19 cases, and the degree of differentiation was not clear in 11 cases. The HR- HPV viral load in well and moderately differentiated patients was significantly higher than that in poorly differentiated patients: 173.56 (62.76, 523.92) RLU/CO vs. 45.71 (4.05, 164.21) RLU/CO, and there was statistical difference (P〈0.05). Conclusions The HR-HPV viral load is decreased with the progression of cervical cancer clinical staging and pathological grading. It shows that HR-HPV viral load in the progression of cervical cancer is not obvious. Lower HR-HPV viral load is common in cervical cancer≥ⅡB stage. It may indicate that low viral load is one of the indicators of poor prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.
出处 《中国医师进修杂志》 2017年第3期193-196,共4页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词 宫颈肿瘤 病毒载量 乳头状瘤病毒感染 Uterine cervical neoplasms Viral load Papillomavirus infections
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Castellsagu ~ X. Natural history and epidemiology of HPV infection and cervical cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2008, 110(3 Supp| 2): $4-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.045.
  • 2Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a recta- analysis[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2007, 8(11):985-993.
  • 3Katki HA, Schiffman M, Castle PE, et al. Five-year risk of recurrence 'after treatment of CIN 2, CIN 3, or AIS: performance ofHPV and Pap cotesting in posttreatment management[J]. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2013, 17 (5 Suppl 1):$78-84. DOI: 10. 1097/ LGT. ObO13e31828543c5.
  • 4Ryu A, Nam K, Kwak J, et al. Early human papillomavirus testing predicts residual/recurrent disease after LEEP [J]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2012, 23(4):217-225.DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2012.23.4.217.
  • 5Baser E, Ozgu E, Erkilinc S, et al. Risk factors for human papillomavirus persistence among women undergoing cold-knife conization for treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2014, 125 (3):275-278. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.12.012.
  • 6Wang F, Xuan XY, Yang X, et al. Stathmin is a marker of progression and poor prognosis in esophageal carcinoma [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey, 2014, 15(8):3613-3618.
  • 7Frega A, Sesti F, Lombardi D, et al. Assessment of HPV-mRNA test to predict recurrent disease in patients previously treated for CIN 2/3 [J]. J Clin Virol, 2014, 60 (1): 39-43.1301: 10.1016/j.jev.2014. 01. 017.
  • 8Bae JH, Kim C J, Park TC, et al. Persistence of human papillomavirus as a predictor for treatment failure after loop electrosurgical excision procedure[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2007, 17(6):1271-1277.
  • 9Kreimer AR, Schiffman M, Herrem R, et al. Long-term risk of recurrent cervical HPV infection and precancer and cancer following excisionai treatment [J]. Int J Cancer, 2012, 131 (1): 211-215. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.26349.
  • 10Xi W, Rui W, Fang L, et al. Expression of Stathmin/op18 as a significant prognostic factor for cervical carcinoma patients [J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2009, 135 (6):837-846.DOI: 10. 1007/ s00432-008-0520-1.

共引文献1

同被引文献78

引证文献9

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部