期刊文献+

对比分析保乳手术与改良根治术治疗早期乳腺癌的临床疗效 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析保乳手术和改良根治术用于早期乳腺癌临床治疗的效果。方法:选2013年3月至2015年3月本院收治的早期乳腺癌患者76例,根据手术方式分成保乳组(入组38例,行保乳手术治疗)和改良组(入组38例,行改良根治术治疗),比较两组手术相关指标(手术时间、术中失血量、切口长度、住院天数)、乳房外观优良率、术后6个月生存质量评分、并发症发生率、术后12个月及36个月复发率和生存率。结果:保乳组手术时间、术中失血量、切口长度和住院天数均较改良组优,P<0.05,有统计学意义;保乳组乳房外观优良率为92.11%,较改良组的50.00%高,P<0.05,有统计学意义;保乳组术后6个月生存质量评分为(81.35±1.26)分,较改良组的(61.33±4.27)分高,P<0.05,有统计学意义;保乳组术后并发症发生率为7.89%,较改良组的26.32%低,P<0.05,有统计学意义;保乳组和改良组术后12个月和36个月疾病复发率与生存率均无显著差异,P>0.05,无统计学意义。结论:早期乳腺癌患者使用保乳手术治疗术后恢复、乳房外观、术后生存质量均较改良根治术理想,并发症发生率更低,值得在临床推荐应用。
作者 程照 杨国保
出处 《中外女性健康研究》 2017年第8期29-29,49,共2页 Women's Health Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献67

  • 1狄根红,亓发芝,吴炅,陆劲松,沈坤炜,沈镇宙,邵志敏.乳腺癌改良根治术后一期乳房再造[J].复旦学报(医学版),2004,31(4):434-435. 被引量:35
  • 2孟祥朝,陈玉琢,张自立,刘俊国,孙惠军.早期乳腺癌改良根治术中保留乳头乳晕25例报告[J].天津医科大学学报,2010,16(4):672-673. 被引量:11
  • 3Fisher B. Biological and clinical considerations regarding the use of surgery and chemotherapy in the treatment of primarybreast cancer[J]. Cancer, 1977, 40(S1): 574-587.
  • 4Early Breast Cancer Trialists" Collaborative Group. Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer: An overview of the randomized trails [J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 1995, 333(22): 1444-1455.
  • 5Reintgen C, Reintgen D, Solin L J. Advances in local-regional treatment for patients with early-stage breast cancer: A review of the field[J]. Clinical Breast Cancer, 2010, 10(3): 180-187.
  • 6Fortin A, Larochelle M, Laverdiere J, et al. Local failure is responsible for the decrease in survival for patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy[J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1999, 17(1): 101-109.
  • 7Khan S A, Eladoumikdachi F. Optimal Surgical treatment of breast cancer: Implications for local control and survival[J]. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2010, 101(8): 677-686.
  • 8Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer [J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2002, 347(16): 1233-1241.
  • 9Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer[J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2002, 347(16): 1227-1232.
  • 10Litii~re S, Werutsky G, Fentiman I S, et al. Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I-II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial[J]. Lancet Oncology, 2012, 13(4): 412-419.

共引文献188

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部