期刊文献+

权力和地位对自利行为的影响及其机制 被引量:13

Effects and mechanisms of power and status on self-interested behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 权力和地位对自利行为的影响不同。权力能够降低认知性观点采择水平,进而使个体更加关注自身利益;地位能够提升认知性观点采择水平,进而使个体推测他人思想与感受,考虑他人利益。然而,权力和地位通过认知性观点采择对自利行为的影响可能受到情境性质的调节。今后的研究应该对这些关系和解释进行验证,探索共情性关心的中介作用,以及权力和地位影响认知性观点采择的调节变量;探究权力和地位拥有者对群体内、外他人的自利行为差异;探讨权力和地位的交互作用对自利行为的影响。 Power and status have different effects on self-interested behavior. Power can diminish cognitive perspective-taking, thus making the individual concerned more about their own interests; status can enhance cognitive perspective-taking, thus impelling the individual to speculate others' thoughts and feelings as well as consider others' interests. However, the effects of power and status on self-interested behavior through cognitive perspective-taking may be moderated by situational properties. Future research should be done to validate these relations and explanations, to explore the mediating role of empathy concern, as well as the moderating variables in the influence of power and status on cognitive perspective-taking; to explore the difference of self-interested behavior of those who own status and power when treating others in the ingroup and outgroup; to investigate the influence of interactive effects of power and status on self-interested behavior.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第5期878-886,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 人的发展与心理健康湖北省重点实验室(华中师范大学)开放课题(2016) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(项目批准号71171094)
关键词 权力 地位 自利行为 认知性观点采择 power status self-interested behavior cognitive perspective-taking
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献313

  • 1寇彧,付马,马艳.初中生认同的亲社会行为的初步研究[J].心理发展与教育,2004,20(4):43-48. 被引量:44
  • 2寇彧,付艳,张庆鹏.青少年认同的亲社会行为:一项焦点群体访谈研究[J].社会学研究,2007(3):154-173. 被引量:25
  • 3韦庆旺.(2008).权力差异和社会动机对谈判行为和结果的影响.博士学位论文.浙江大学.
  • 4Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377.
  • 5Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.
  • 6Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462--479.
  • 7Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power-sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.
  • 8Berdahl, J. L., & Anderson, C. (2002). Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 497-509.
  • 9Carver, C. S., Sutton, $. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741-751.
  • 10Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 183-187.

共引文献143

同被引文献104

引证文献13

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部