期刊文献+

多元启发理论与对外政策决策研究 被引量:1

Poliheuristic Theory and Foreign Policy Decision Making Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,多元启发理论发展趋势较为迅猛,且已得到大量研究的证实。多元启发理论在认知理论和理性选择理论之间构建了一座桥梁,它认为对外政策决策包含两个加工阶段。第一阶段以维度加工为基础,不满足非补偿性政治维度阈限的方案将被删除;第二阶段以方案加工为基础,对剩余方案进行理性分析,力求将结果的利益最大化,风险最小化。运用多元启发理论开展对外政策决策的研究主要体现在理论应用和理论验证两方面。回顾相关研究发现,多元启发理论过于强调国内政治限制,未来的研究不应忽视决策个体、决策背景、决策任务三方面因素及彼此间的互动。 In recent years, the development trend of poliheuristic theory is relatively rapid, and has been confirmed by numerous empirical studies. Poliheuristic theory constructs a bridge between the cognitive theory and rational choice theory, and postulates that foreign policy decision contains two processing stages. The first stage is a dimension-based processing, alternatives which do not meet the noncompensatory political dimension threshold will be deleted; the second stage is a alternative-based processing, use rational analysis for the survival options, and in at- tempt to maximize benefits and minimize risks. Applying poliheuristic theory to study decision of foreign policy is mainly reflected in two aspects of theoretical application and theoretical validation. By reviewing the relevant studies, we found that poliheuristic theory emphasizes the domestic political constraints too much, the difference of decision makers, decision conditions and properties of decision tasks, these three factors should not be ignored in the future study, the interac- tion between them should also be considered.
作者 肖晞 王琳
出处 《教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期104-112,共9页 Teaching and Research
基金 吉林大学青年师生学科交叉培育项目"多元启发理论与对外政策决策研究"(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助) 吉林大学哲学社会科学研究重大课题培育项目"国际秩序变革与中国和平发展"(项目号:2015ZDPY18)的阶段性成果
关键词 多元启发理论 对外政策决策 两阶段加工 非补偿性原则 poliheuristic theory foreign policy decision making two-stage processing non-compensatory principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献40

  • 1尹继武.认知心理学在国际关系研究中的应用:进步及其问题[J].外交评论(外交学院学报),2006,23(4):101-110. 被引量:23
  • 2[美]托马斯·库恩著 金吾伦 胡新和译.《科学革命的结构》[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003年版.第157页.
  • 3Tim Dunne, Michael Cox, Ken Booth eds., The Eighty Years' Crisis : International Relations, 1919 - 1999 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 34-35.
  • 4Alex Mintz, "The Noncompensatory Principle of Coalition Formation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol.7, No.3 (July 1995), pp.335-349
  • 5Astorino-Courtois, Allison and Brittani Trusty, “Degrees of Difficulty: The Effect of Israeli Policy Shifts on Syrian Peace Decisions,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 44, No. 3 (June 2000), pp.359-377
  • 6Alex Mintz, "The Poliheuristic Theory of War and Peace Decision Making," Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 1999
  • 7Alex Mintz and Allison Astorino-Courtois, “Simulating Decision Processes: Expanding the Poliheuristic Theory to Model N-Person Strategic Interactions in International Relations,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, February 2001
  • 8Alex Mintz, "How Do Leaders Make Decisions? A Poliheuristic Perspective," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 48, No. 1 (February 2004)
  • 9Alex Mintz,“Foreign Policy Decision Making in Familiar and Unfamiliar Settings: An Experimental Study of High-Ranking Military Officers,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol.48, No. 1 (February 2004).
  • 10Valerie M. Hudson, “Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations,” Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 1 (March 2005), pp. 1-30

共引文献16

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部