摘要
目的:回顾性分析浙江大学医学院附属第一医院收治的91例晚期胆系恶性肿瘤患者的化疗疗效及影响因素。方法:收集浙江大学医学院附属第一医院2010年1月至2015年4月治疗的91例晚期胆系恶性肿瘤患者临床资料,分析患者的基础特征、治疗方案及疗效。结果:91例患者中男性56例,女性35例,中位年龄为57岁。共90例患者接受了一线化疗并且可以评价疗效,69例患者接受了GP方案,21例患者接受了其他方案,二者疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)为68.1%vs.52.4%;中位无进展生存期(median progression free survival,mPFS)为5.10个月vs.2.50个月(P=0.025);中位总生存期(median overall survival,mOS)为13.00个月vs.7.20个月。43例患者接受了二线化疗并且可以评价疗效,31例患者接受了S-1为基础的化疗方案,12例患者接受了非S-1为基础的化疗方案,DCR、mPFS、mOS差异均无统计学意义。4例患者接受了含贝伐珠单抗的二线治疗方案,其mPFS及mOS较其他方案均延长,但差异无统计学意义。血液学毒性为一线GP方案最常见的不良反应。S-1为基础的化疗方案不良反应较少。结论:对晚期胆系肿瘤患者来说,GP方案是有效的一线治疗方案,S-1作为二线治疗药物疗效尚可,贝伐珠单抗的治疗效果亟需进一步试验证实。
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinoma and the factors that influence survival. Methods: A total of 91 cases of advanced biliary tract carcinoma from January 2010 to April 2015 were enrolled in our study. The patients' characteristics, chemotherapy regimens, and effects were analyzed. Results: We enrolled 56 males and 35 females with a median age of 57 years. A total of 90 patients were assessable for their responses to first-line chemotherapy. A total of 69 patients re- ceived the GP regimen, whereas 21 patients received some other regimens. The disease control rate (DCR), median progression free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) were 68.2% versus 52.4%, 5.20 months versus 2.50 months (P=0.025), and 13.00 months versus 7.20 months, respectively. Only 31 patients received S-1 based regimens, and 12 patients received some other regi- mens as second-line chemotherapy. The DCR, median PFS, and median 05 showed no statistical differences. Only four patients received S-2 based regimen plus bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy (median PFS 5.3 months; median OS 7 months). Hematologi- cal toxicity was the most common side effect in the first-line GP regimen. The side effects of the S-1 based chemotherapy regimen was relatively less. Conclusion: The GP regimen is an effective first-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinoma, whereas S-1 ap- pears as an effective second-line chemotherapy drug. Bevacizumab-based regimens may be effective and require further validation.
出处
《中国肿瘤临床》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2017年第9期429-433,共5页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
关键词
晚期胆系恶性肿瘤
化疗
贝伐珠单抗
总生存期
advanced biliary tract carcinoma, chemotherapy, bevacizumab, overall survival