期刊文献+

腹腔镜下不同手术方式对输卵管妊娠患者妊娠结局的影响 被引量:5

Influence of Different Laparoscope-guided Surgeries on Pregnant Outcomes of Patients with Salpingocyesis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜下输卵管切除术与输卵管切开取胚术对输卵管妊娠患者妊娠结局的影响。方法根据手术方式的不同,将94例输卵管妊娠患者分为切除组45例(行输卵管切除术)和取胚组49例(行输卵管切开取胚术),比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院天数,观察术后两年内再次异位妊娠及宫内妊娠情况。结果与取胚组比较,切除组术中出血量明显减少,手术时间、住院天数明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。切除组术后两年内再次异位妊娠率为4.44%,显著低于取胚组的18.37%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);切除组宫内妊娠率为55.56%,取胚组为61.22%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜下输卵管切除术可有效降低输卵管妊娠患者的再次异位妊娠率,但对宫内妊娠无明显影响。 OBJECTIVE To compare the influence of laparoscope-guided salpingectomy and salpingotomy for embryo collection on preg- nant outcomes of patients with salpingocyesis. METHODS A total of 94 patients with salpingocyesis were divided into resection group (n=45) treated with laparoscope-guided salpingectomy and embryo-collecting group (n=49) with laparoscope-guided salpingotomy based on different surgeries. Surgical duration, intra-operative hemorrhagic volume, and hospital stays were compared between two groups, and postoperative re-ectopic pregnancy and intrauterine pregnancy were observed. RESULTS Compared with embryo-collect- ing group, resection group were markedly less in intra-operative hemorrhagic volume and notably shorter in surgical duration and hospital stay (P〈0.01). The rate of re-ectopic pregnancy within postoperative 2 years was 4.44% in resection group, evidently low- er than the 18.37% in embryo-collecting group (P.〈0.05). Meanwhile, the rate of intrauterine pregnancy was 55.56% in resection group, lower than the 61.22% in embryo-collecting group, but there was insignificant difference(P〉0.05). CONCLUSION Laparo- scope-guided salpingectomy can effectively reduce the rate of re-ectopic pregnancy without influencing intrauterine pregnancy in pa- tients with salpingocyesis.
出处 《中国初级卫生保健》 2017年第5期30-31,共2页 Chinese Primary Health Care
关键词 输卵管妊娠 腹腔镜 输卵管切除术 输卵管切开取胚术 妊娠结局 salpingocyesis laparoscope salpingectomy salpingotomy for embryo collection pregnant outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献53

  • 1于淼,邓成艳.抗苗勒管激素评估卵巢储备功能的临床应用[J].中国医学科学院学报,2009,31(1):114-119. 被引量:4
  • 2李宝艳,周维,刘晓瑛,周萍.腹腔镜下不同术式治疗输卵管妊娠对再次妊娠的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2005,20(12):1455-1456. 被引量:15
  • 3姚书忠,王海英,陈玉清.输卵管妊娠术后生殖状况及其影响因素分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(5):358-360. 被引量:92
  • 4陈晨,张震宇,李淑红,史秀婷.腹腔镜下采用不同术式治疗输卵管妊娠后的生殖状态[J].北京医学,2007,29(10):604-606. 被引量:12
  • 5Al-Turki HA. A review of 33 years (1980-2013) of data indicating a rise in ectopic pregnancy in Saudi Arabia[ J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2015, 128(1) : 33-35.
  • 6Shobeiri F, Tehranian N, Nazari M. Trend of ectopic pregnancy and its main determinants in Hamadan prov- ince, Iran (2000-2010)[J]. BMC Res Notes, 2014, 7:733. doi: 10. 1186/1756-0500-7-733.
  • 7Li C, Meng CX, Zhao WH, et al. Risk factors for ectop- ic pregnancy in women with planned pregnancy: a case- control study [ J ]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2014, 181: 176-182. doi: 10. 1016/j. ejogrb. 2014.07. 049. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
  • 8Malacova E, Kemp A, Hart R, et al. Long-term risk of ectopic pregnancy varies by method of tubal sterilization: a whole-population study [J]. Fertil Steril, 2014, 101 (3) : 728-734.
  • 9Home AW, Brown JK, Nio-Kobayashi J, et al. The as- sociation between smoking and ectopic pregnancy: why nicotine is BAD for your fallopian tube [ J ]. PLoS One, 2014, 9 (2) : e89400, doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0089400.
  • 10Mol F, van Mello NM, Strandell A, et al. Salpingoto- my versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2014, 383 (9927) : 1483- 1489.

共引文献64

同被引文献23

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部