期刊文献+

消费税对城镇居民收入差距的调节效果分析 被引量:8

An Analysis on the Adjusting Effect of Consumption Tax on the Urban Resident Income Gap
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文根据2007-2012年《中国城市(镇)生活与价格年鉴》、《中国税务年鉴》以及CEIC数据库相关数据,运用直接法计算了消费税征收前后城镇居民可支配收入(以下简称"居民收入")的基尼系数,并按照收入来源对消费税基尼系数进行分解,分析了影响消费税收入分配效应的关键因素。研究发现,我国消费税能够缩小居民收入差距,但调节效果有限;酒和卷烟消费税对居民收入差距的负向调节作用在一定程度上抵消了成品油和汽车消费税的正向调节作用;2009年之前,卷烟消费税大大降低了消费税的收入分配效应,而2009年开始,成品油消费税成为影响消费税分配效应的最主要因素。 Based on the statistical data of China Urban Life and Price Yearbook, China Taxation Yearbook and CEIC between 2007 and 2012, this paper directly calculates the Gini coefficients of urban resident income before and after consumption taxation, and decomposes the Gini coefficients according to the tax source to analyze the key factor influencing the income distribution effect of consumption tax. The paper finds that China's consumption tax can limitedly narrow the income gap; the negative impact of alcohol and cigarette consumption tax on income gap to a certain extent offset the positive impact of refined oil and automobile consumption tax; before 2009, cigarette consumption tax greatly reduced the income distribution effect, and after 2009, the refined oil consumption tax has become the most important factor affecting the income distribution.
作者 赵艾凤 马骁
出处 《税务研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期23-28,共6页
基金 中国博士后第九批特别资助项目"新常态下税收结构与要素收入区域差距的关系研究"(项目编号:2016T90360) 中国博士后第五十七批面上项目"税收结构对区域间要素收入流动性的影响研究"(项目编号:2015M570355) 国家社会科学基金重点项目"城镇化对城乡居民收入差距的影响机理与政策选择研究"(项目编号:15AJY005) 国家自然科学基金面上项目"收入分布函数的研究及在中国的应用"(项目编号:71473203) 中央高校基本科研业务创新团队项目(项目编号:15CX120502)的阶段性成果
关键词 消费税 收入差距 收入分配 Consumption tax Income gap Income distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献47

  • 1郝春虹.我国现行税制结构考察:兼论现行流转税的累退性[J].财政研究,2006,22(1):33-37. 被引量:4
  • 2赵娜,崔玉平.新一轮税制改革下消费税调整的社会福利效应分析[J].经济论坛,2007(5):48-49. 被引量:2
  • 3Atkinson, A. , "The Distribution of the Tax Burden", in Quigley,J. , and E. Smolensky (Eds.), Modern Public Finance. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1994.
  • 4Australian Bureau of Statistics, "Review of Methodology for Estimating Taxes on Production in the Calculation of Household Final Income", Cat 1351.0.55. 012-Research Paper, 2007.
  • 5Besley, T. , and H. Rosen, "Sales Taxes and Prices: An Empirical Analysis," National Tax Jour- nal, 1999,52(2), 157-178.
  • 6Creedy, J. , "Indirect Tax Reforms in Australia: The Welfare Effects on Different Demographic Groups", Australian Economic Papers, 1999, 38(4), 367 -392.
  • 7Creedy, J. , "Indirect Tax Reform and the Role of Exemptions", Fiscal Studies, 2001, 22 (4), 457-486.
  • 8Decoster, A. , and G. Van Camp, "Redistributive Effects of the Shift from Personal Income Taxes to Indirect Taxes: Belgium 1988-93",Fiscal Studies, 2001, 22(1), 79-106.
  • 9Devarajan, S. , D. Fullerton, and R. Musgrave, "Estimating the Distribution of Tax Burdens: A Comparison of Different Approaches",Journal of Public Economics, 1980, 13(2), 155-182.
  • 10Hamilton, S., "Excise Taxes with Multiproduct Transactions", American Economic RevievJ, 2009, 99(1), 458 -471.

共引文献266

同被引文献88

引证文献8

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部