期刊文献+

应用蒙特卡罗模拟优化MRSA感染患者给药方案 被引量:5

Optimization of dosing regimens in MRSA infected patients by Monte Carlo simulation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:对MRSA感染患者不同给药方案进行蒙特卡罗模拟评价给药方案。方法:将万古霉素、替考拉宁、利奈唑胺和替加环素各种给药方案进行5 000次蒙特卡罗模拟,将得到的达标概率(PTA)和累积反应分数(CFR)进行比较。结果:万古霉素(2 g·d^(-1),3 g·d^(-1))的CFR分别为58.46%和90.79%;替考拉宁(0.4 g·d^(-1),0.8 g·d^(-1))的CFR分别为65.37%和98.64%;利奈唑胺(1.2 g·d^(-1))的CFR为49.27%;替加环素(100 mg·d^(-1),200 mg·d^(-1))的CFR分别为96.46%和100%。结论:替加环素最有可能达到所需的CFR。对于糖肽类药物来说,增加给药剂量可以获得较好的CFR。对于利奈唑胺来说,当MIC>1 mg·L^(-1)时,需要增加给药剂量或改用其他药物。 OBJECTIVE To optimize dosing regimens in MRSA infected patients using Monte Carlo simulation.METHODSA5 000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to estimate the probability of target attainment(PTA)and cumulative fraction of response(CFR)for vancomycin,teicoplanin,linezolid and tigecycline.RESULTS The estimated CFRs were58.46% and 90.79%for vancomycin(2 g·d^-1,3 g·d^-1),65.37% and 98.64% for teicoplanin(0.4 g·d^-1,0.8 g·d^-1),49.27%for linezolid,96.46% and 100%for tigecycline(100 mg·d^-1,200 mg·d^-1).CONCLUSION Tigecycline has a greater probability to achieve its CFR.Higher doses improve CFRs for both glycopeptides.With MIC1 mg·L^-1,higher dose of linezolid or switching to other drug is necessary to improve efficacy.
出处 《中国医院药学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第9期859-861,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
基金 郑州大学第一附属医院院内基金
关键词 蒙特卡罗模拟 万古霉素 替考拉宁 利奈唑胺 替加环素 Monte Carlo simulation vancomycin teicoplanin linezolid tigecycline
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献84

  • 1何礼贤,潘珏,陈世耀,王爱霞,谢灿茂,申正义.替考拉宁治疗革兰阳性球菌感染的临床研究[J].中华内科杂志,2005,44(5):337-341. 被引量:30
  • 2汪复.2005中国CHINET细菌耐药性监测结果[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2006,6(5):289-295. 被引量:284
  • 3汪复,张婴元.实用抗感染治疗学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:238.
  • 4Arias CA. Murray BE. Antibiotic-resistant bugs in the 21st century-a clinical super-challenge[J].N Engl J Med. 2009. 360(5): 439-443.
  • 5Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing[S]. Twentyfourth informational supplement. 2014. M100-S24 Vol 34 No. 1.
  • 6Hu F. Chen S. Xu X. et al. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates from a teaching hospital in Shanghai. China[J]. J Med Microbiol , 2012. 61 (Pr 1): 132- 136.
  • 7Brink AJ. Feldman C. Grolman DC. et al. Appropriate use of the carbapenems[J]. S Afr Med J. 2004. 94 (10 Pt 2): 857-861.
  • 8Chen S. Hu F. Zhang X. et al. Independent emergence of colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates without colistin treatrnentj]]. J Clin Microbiol , 2011. 49( 11): 4022- 4023.
  • 9van Duin D. Kaye KS. Neuner EA. et al. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a review of treatment and outcomes[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013. 75(2): l1S-120.
  • 10Daikos GL. Tsaousi S. Tzouvelekis LS. et al. Carbapenemaseproducing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: lowering mortality by antibiotic combination schemes and the role of carbapenems [J]. Antimicrob Agents Chernother , 2014.58 (4): 2322-2328.

共引文献1465

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部